Welcome to visit Zhongnan Medical Journal Press Series journal website!

Analysis of pre-course learning situation of postgraduates in the selection of evidence-based medicine course at Peking University Health Science Center

Published on Jul. 30, 2024Total Views: 293 timesTotal Downloads: 124 timesDownloadMobile

Author: ZHANG Meng 1, 2 LIU Fengqi 1, , 2 WU Shanshan 3, 4 WU Tao 1, 2 SUN Feng 1, 2, 5, 6

Affiliation: 1. School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China 2. Key Laboratory of Epidemiology of Major Diseases (Peking University), Ministry of Education, Beijing 100191, China 3. Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Evidence-based Medicine, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China 4. National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing 100050, China 5. Peking University Center for Evidence Based Medical and Clinical Research, Beijing 100191, China 6. Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830017, China

Keywords: Evidence-based medicine Meta-analysis Blended teaching method Pre-course evaluation Learning situation analysis

DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1004-5511.202311121

Reference: Zhang M, Liu FQ, Wu SS, Wu T, Sun F. Analysis of pre-course learning situation of postgraduates in the selection of evidence-based medicine course at Peking University Health Science Center[J]. Yixue Xinzhi Zazhi, 2024, 34(7): 825-832. DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1004-5511.202311121.[Article in Chinese]

  • Abstract
  • Full-text
  • References
Abstract

Objective  To understand the basic evidence-based knowledge mastery  of postgraduates before the course of the network Meta-analysis of Peking University Health Science Center.

Methods  This study focused on graduate students who attended the Evidence Integration and Application: Network Meta-analysis Course from 2021 to 2023. Questionnaires were used to assess students' knowledge of network Meta-Analysis and attitudes related to the course, and comparisons were made between master's and doctoral students using the Kruskal-Wallis H test.

Results  A total of 84 students participated in the survey, including 54 master's students and 30 doctoral students. Students who enrolled in the course had a certain level of competence in literature searching and reading skills before taking the course, with no statistically significant differences between master's and doctoral students (P>0.05). Students had a basic understanding of fundamental course terms, but displayed relative weaknesses in the knowledge of the specific application of Meta-analysis, with proportions ranging from 46.67% to 61.11% of students reporting unfamiliarity with these aspects. Compared to doctoral students, master's students exhibited a reduced comprehension of differences between systematic review and traditional review (P=0.014), and basic steps to implement evidence-based medicine (P<0.001), the differences between the two groups were statistically significant. Graduate students who selected this course generally had initiative and curiosity of learning.

Conclusion  Students who chose this course demonstrate superior literature search and reading abilities, and they are prepared to approach this course with a serious attitude. However, there is still a need to improve their understanding of Meta-analysis related content. The results provide reference of the improvement of the teaching content and model of this course.

Full-text
Please download the PDF version to read the full text: download
References

1.Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, et al. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't[J]. BMJ, 1996, 312(7023): 71-72. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71.

2.Albarqouni L, Hoffmann T, Straus S, et al. Core competencies in evidence-based practice for health professionals: consensus statement based on a systematic review and delphi survey[J]. JAMA Netw Open, 2018, 1(2): e180281. DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.0281.

3.Saunders H, Gallagher-Ford L, Kvist T, et al. Practicing healthcare professionals' evidence-based practice competencies: an overview of systematic reviews[J]. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs, 2019, 16(3): 176-185. DOI: 10.1111/wvn.12363.

4.Murphy KA, Guisard Y, Curtin M, et al. Evidence-based practice: what do undergraduate health students think it means?[J]. FoHPE, 2019, 20(3): 12-29. DOI: 10.11157/FOHPE.V20I3.319.

5.Sadeghi-Bazargani H, Tabrizi JS, Azami-Aghdash S. Barriers to evidence-based medicine: a systematic review[J]. J Eval Clin Pract, 2014, 20(6) : 793-802. DOI: 10.1111/jep.12222.

6.曾宪涛, 曹世义, 孙凤, 等. Meta分析系列之六: 间接比较及网状分析[J]. 中国循证心血管医学杂志, 2012, 4(5): 399-402. [Zeng XT, Cao SY, Sun F, et al. Meta-analysis series 6: indirect comparison and network analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Cardiovascular Medicine, 2012, 4(5): 399-402.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-4055.2012.05.003.

7.Tian J, Gao Y, Zhang J, et al. Progress and challenges of network Meta-analysis [J]. J Evid Based Med, 2021, 14(3): 218-231. DOI: 10.1111/jebm.12443.

8.Ge L, Tian JH, Li XX, et al. Epidemiology characteristics, methodological assessment and reporting of statistical analysis of network Meta-analyses in the field of cancer [J]. Sci Rep, 2016, 6: 37208. DOI: 10.1038/srep37208.

9.Mills EJ, Thorlund K, Ioannidis JP. Demystifying trial networks and network Meta-analysis [J]. BMJ, 2013, 346: f2914. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.f2914.

10.刘佐相, 刘凤琪, 刘英丽, 等. 基于Canvas平台的混合式教学模式在研究生循证医学课程教学中的应用效果[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2022, 42(1): 46-49. [Liu ZX, Liu FQ, Liu YL, et al. The effectiveness of blended teaching method based on Canvas platform in the training of evidence-based medicine for postgraduates[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 2022, 42(1): 46-49.] DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20210426-00556.

11.张超, 鄢金柱, 孙凤, 等. 网状Meta分析一致性的鉴别与处理方法[J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2014, 14(7): 884-888. [Zhang C, Yan JZ, Sun F, et al. Differentiation and handling of homogeneity in network Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2014, 14(7): 884-888.] DOI: 10.7507/1672-2531.20140146.

12.Schuers M, Griffon N, Kerdelhue G, et al. Behavior and attitudes of residents and general practitioners in searching for health information: From intention to practice[J]. Int J Med Inform, 2016, 89: 9-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.02.003.

13.刘智洁, 郑紫薇, 肖元梅, 等. 医学研究生循证能力的表现形式及培养方式[J]. 医学教育管理, 2023, 9(5): 599-604. [Liu ZJ, Zheng ZW, Xiao YM, et al. Manifestations and training mode of evidence-based competence of medical postgraduates[J]. Medical Education Management, 2023, 9(5): 599-604.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-045X.2023.05.011.

14.李杨, 余亮. 基于Canvas平台的混合式学习教学设计与实践研究[J]. 中国教育信息化, 2018, (4): 16-23. [Li Y, Yu L. Research on blended learning teaching design and practice based on Canvas platform[J]. Chinese Journal of ICT in Education, 2018, (4): 16-23.] DOI: CNKI:SUN:JYXX.0.2018-08-005.

15.夏晓敏, 杨子胜, 孔莹博. 基于Canvas平台的线上课程建设与教学实践——以中原工学院房屋建筑学课程为例[J]. 河南教育(高教), 2022, (8): 73-75. [Xia XM, Yang ZS, Kong YB. Online course construction and teaching practice based on Canvas platform-A case study of Building Architecture Course in Zhongyuan Institute of Technology[J]. HeNan Education (Higher Education), 2022, (8): 73-75.] https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HEGJ202208027.htm.

16.黄苗, 杨冰, 薛丹丹. 高校护理教师循证护理能力现状及影响因素分析[J]. 中国继续医学教育, 2021, 13(25): 78-81. [Huang M, Yang B, Xue DD. Status and influencing factors of evidence-based nursing competences among nursing faculty in universities[J]. China Continuing Medical Education, 2021, 13(25): 78-81.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9308.2021.25.021.

17.王建华, 王列, 孙丽, 等. CBL和TBL教学模式在中医药循证医学系统评价教学过程中的应用[J]. 中华养生保健, 2023, 41(24): 82-85. [Wang JH, Wang L, Sun  L, et al. The application of CBL and TBL teaching models in the teaching process of evidence-based medicine system evaluation[J]. Chinese Health Care, 2023, 41(24): 82-85.] https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QGZH202324024.htm.