Welcome to visit Zhongnan Medical Journal Press Series journal website!

Detection value of umbilical artery pulsatility index in growth-restricted fetuses

Published on Feb. 02, 2026Total Views: 35 timesTotal Downloads: 15 timesDownloadMobile

Author: GAO Jie TU Hao

Affiliation: Department of Ultrasonic Imaging, The Central Hospital of Enshi Tujia and Miao Autonomous Prefecture, Enshi 445000, Hubei Province, China

Keywords: Umbilical artery pulsatility index Fetal growth restriction Perinatal outcome Predictive value

DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1004-5511.202411119

Reference: Gao J, Tu H. Detection value of umbilical artery pulsatility index in growth-restricted fetuses[J]. Yixue Xinzhi Zazhi, 2026, 36(1): 30-36. DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1004-5511.202411119. [Article in Chinese]

  • Abstract
  • Full-text
  • References
Abstract

Objective  To investigate the impact and predictive value of bilateral umbilical artery (UA) pulsatility index (PI) abnormalities on perinatal outcomes in fetuses with fetal growth restriction (FGR).

Methods  FGR fetuses and their mothers who delivered at the Central Hospital of Enshi Tujia and Miao Autonomous Prefecture from July 2022 to June 2024 were included in this study. Based on the UA-PI at the last prenatal examination, the mothers were divided into three groups: normal bilateral UA-PI group, abnormal unilateral UA-PI group, and abnormal bilateral UA-PI group. General information, ultrasound characteristics, and neonatal perinatal outcomes were compared among the three groups, and the association between neonatal perinatal outcomes and bilateral UA-PI abnormalities was analyzed.

Results  A total of 516 maternal pairs and FGR fetuses were included. Among them, 91 cases with unilateral abnormal UA-PI (17.64%), 349 cases with normal bilateral UA-PI (67.64%), and 76 cases with abnormal bilateral UA-PI (14.73%). Compared with the group with normal bilateral UA-PI, the groups with abnormal unilateral and bilateral UA-PI had poorer ultrasound parameters and perinatal outcomes, especially the group with abnormal bilateral UA-PI. The predictive AUC values ​​of UA-PI for adverse perinatal outcomes of 8 fetuses ranged from 0.670 to 0.778, with relatively high predictive value for preterm birth <34 weeks of gestation and cesarean section due to fetal distress.

Conclusion  The number of abnormal UA-PI values showed a dose-response relationship with adverse perinatal outcomes and had a certain predictive power for adverse perinatal  outcomes.

Full-text
Please download the PDF version to read the full text: download
References

1.Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM), Martins JG, Biggio  JR, et  al. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Consult Series #52: Diagnosis and management of fetal growth restrictio[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2020, 223(4): B2-B17.

2.Kingdom J, Ashwal E, Lausman A, et al. Guideline No. 442: fetal growth restriction: screening, diagnosis, and management in singleton pregnancies[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 2023, 45(10): 102154.

3.Groten T, Lehmann T, Städtler M, et al. Effect of pentaerythritol tetranitrate (PETN) on the development of fetal growth restriction in pregnancies with impaired uteroplacental perfusion at midgestation-a randomized trial[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2023, 228(1): 84. e1-84. e12.

4.Pels A, Derks J, Elvan-Taspinar A, et al. Maternal sildenafil vs placebo in pregnant women with severe early-onset fetal growth restriction: a randomized clinical trial[J]. JAMA Netw Open, 2020, 3(6): e205323.

5.Smith GC, Moraitis AA, Wastlund D, et al. Universal late pregnancy ultrasound screening to predict adverse outcomes in nulliparous women: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis[J]. Health Technol Assess, 2021, 25(15): 1-190.

6.黄欢, 黎新艳, 庞彩英, 等. 正常胎儿脐静脉血流率与脐动脉搏动指数比值的研究[J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2022, 31(5): 394-399. [Huang H, Li XY, Pang CY, et al. Study on the ratio of normal fetal umbilical vein blood flow rate to umbilical artery pulsatility index[J] Chinese Journal of Ultrasound Imaging, 2022, 31(5): 394-399.]

7.Steller JG, Driver C, Gumina D, et al. Doppler velocimetry discordance between paired umbilical artery vessels and clinical implications in fetal growth restriction[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2022, 227(2): 285. e1-285. e7.

8.王泽华, 李淑文. 妇产科学(第9版)[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2018: 135. [Wang ZH, Li SW, Duan T. Obstetrics and Gynecology (9th edition)[M]. Beijing: People's Health Publishing House, 2018: 135]

9.吴艳, 谢穗. 1 531例孕妇中高危妊娠脐动脉搏动指数测定联合胎心监护对胎儿预后的评估[J]. 安徽医药, 2011, 15(2): 206-208. [Wu Y, Xie S. Fetal umbilical pulsatitity index and non-stress test for the evaluation of fetal prognosis in high risk pregnancy[J] Anhui Pharmaceutical, 2011, 15(2): 206-208.]

10.Ramesh S, Hariprasath S, Anandan G, et al. Single umbilical artery[J]. J Pharm Bioallied Sci, 2015, 7(Suppl 1): S83-S84.

11.Lin W, Lai Y, Zhuang S, et al. The effects of prenatal PM2.5 oxidative potential exposure on feto-placental vascular resistance and fetal weight: a repeated-measures study[J]. Environ Res, 2023, 234: 116543.

12.Moraitis AA, Bainton T, Sovio U, et al. Fetal umbilical artery doppler as a tool for universal third trimester screening: a systematic review and Meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy[J]. Placenta, 2021, 108: 47-54.

13.Cahill LS, Mercer GV, Jagota D, et al. Doppler ultrasound of the fetal descending aorta: an objective tool to assess placental blood flow resistance in pregnancies with discordant umbilical arteries[J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2022, 41(4): 899-905.

14.Perkovic-Kepeci S, Cirkovic A, Milic N, et al. Doppler indices of the uterine, umbilical and fetal middle cerebral artery in diabetic versus non-diabetic pregnancy: systematic review and Meta-Analysis[J]. Medicina (Kaunas), 2023, 59(8): 1502.

15.Mahajan KS, Dewani D, Duragkar S. Umbilical artery doppler indices in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: impact on fetal outcomes[J]. Cureus, 2023, 15(12): e50876.

16.Zhang Z, Liu F, Zhang Q, et al. Umbilical artery ultrasound haemodynamics combined with serum adiponectin levels can aid in predicting adverse pregnancy outcomes in patients with severe pre-eclampsia[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol, 2023, 43(2): 2232656.

17.Stanek J. Single umbilical artery umbilical cord is associated with high-grade distal fetal vascular malperfusion[J]. Pediatr Dev Pathol, 2024, 27(1): 52-58.

18.Guvendag Guven ES, Karcaaltincaba D, Kandemir O, et al. Cord blood oxidative stress markers correlate with umbilical artery pulsatility in fetal growth restriction[J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2013, 26(6): 576-580.

19.Liu Q, Li B. The diagnostic value of ultrasound detection of the fetal middle cerebral artery, umbilical artery blood flow and fetal movement reduction in fetal distress[J]. Am J Transl Res, 2021, 13(4): 3529-3535.

20.Lin Y, Yan R, He A, et al. Double-to-single umbilical artery with a low pulsatility index leading to fetal death: a case report and review of literature[J]. Cureus, 2023, 15(12): e51273.

21.Martins JG, Kawakita T, Barake C, et al. Rate of deterioration of umbilical artery Doppler indices in fetuses with severe early-onset fetal growth restriction[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM, 2024, 6(3): 101283.

22.Kaur K, Acharya G, Chen H, et al. Impact of fetal trisomy 21 on umbilical artery Doppler indices[J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2022, 35(25): 8364-8371.

23.Thuring A, Maršál K, Laurini R. Placental ischemia and changes in umbilical and uteroplacental arterial and venous hemodynamics[J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2012, 25(6): 750-755.

24.Gibbons A, Flatley C, Kumar S. The fetal cerebro-placental ratio in diabetic pregnancies is influenced more by the umbilical artery rather than middle cerebral artery pulsatility index[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2017, 211: 56-61.

25.Saghian R, Cahill L, Rahman A, et al. Interpretation of wave reflections in the umbilical arterial segment of the feto-placental circulation: computational modeling of the feto-placental arterial tree[J]. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 2021, 68(12): 3647-3658.

26.Henrichs J, de Jonge A, Westerneng M, et al. Cost-effectiveness of routine third trimester ultrasound screening for fetal growth restriction compared to care as usual in low-risk pregnancies: a pragmatic nationwide stepped-wedge cluster-randomized trial in the netherlands (the IRIS study)[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2022, 19(6): 3312.

27.Schönnagel L, Caffard T, Vu-Han TL, et al. Predicting postoperative outcomes in lumbar spinal fusion: development of a machine learning model[J]. Spine J, 2024, 24(2): 239-249.

28.Rani S, Huria A, Kaur R. Prediction of perinatal outcome in preeclampsia using middle cerebral artery and umbilical artery pulsatility and resistance indices[J]. Hypertens Pregnancy, 2016, 35(2): 210-216.

29.Sacchi C, Marino C, Nosarti C, et al. Association of intrauterine growth restriction and small for gestational age status with childhood cognitive outcomes: a systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. JAMA Pediatr, 2020, 174(8): 772-781.

30.Manapurath R, Gadapani B, Pereira-da-Silva L. Body composition of infants born with intrauterine growth restriction: a systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. Nutrients, 2022, 14(5): 1085.

31.Elsheikh M, El Amrousy D, El-Mahdy H, et al. Lipid profile after omega-3 supplementation in neonates with intrauterine growth retardation: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Pediatr Res, 2023, 94(4): 1503-1509.

Popular Papers