Welcome to visit Zhongnan Medical Journal Press Series journal website!
Zhongnan Medical Journal Press Series of Journals Center for Evidence-Based and Translational Medicine of Wuhan University

The title
  • The title
  • The keywords
  • The author
Submit中文版

HomeArticlesVol 31,2021 No.1Detail

Second in the series of shared decision making: a model for shared decision making research, the Ottawa Patient Decision Aids Research Group

Published on Feb. 20, 2021Total Views: 7042 timesTotal Downloads: 3221 timesDownloadMobile

Author: Shao-Fu YU 1 Wei MU 2 Ying-Hui JIN 3 Sha-Sha ZHAI 4 Jian-Ping GONG 1 Bo-Xuan LIU 5 Li-Ye LU 6 Li-Ming TAN 7

Affiliation: 1. Department of Clinical Pharmacy, the Second People's Hospital of Huaihua, Huaihua 418000, Hunan Province, China 2. Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese medicine, Tianjin 300250, China 3. Center for Evidence-Based and Translational Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430071, China 4. Department of Traumatology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Medical College, Huaihua 418000, Hunan Province, China 5. Precision Medicine Center, the Second People's Hospital of Huaihua, Huaihua 418000, Hunan Province, China 6. Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital of Yongnian District, Handan 057150, Hebei Province, China 7. The Second People's Hospital of Huaihua, Huaihua 418000, Hunan Province, China

Keywords: Shared decision making Patient decision aid The ottawa patient decision aids research group

DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1004-5511.2021.01.08

Reference: Yu SF, Mu W, Jin YH, Zhai SS, Gong JP, Liu BX, Lu LY, Tan LM. Second in the series of shared decision making: a model for shared decision making research, the Ottawa Patient Decision Aids Research Group[J]. Yixue Xinzhi Zazhi, 2021, 31(1): 59-67. DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1004-5511.2021.01.08.[Article in Chinese]

  • Abstract
  • Full-text
  • References
Abstract

The study of shared decision making (SDM) has been going on in the western countries for many decades, and representative research groups such as the Ottawa Patient Decision Aids Research Group, the Mayo Clinic Shared Decision Making National Resource Center and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence have been well established. In this paper, the authors reviewed the establishment and mission of the Ottawa Patient Decision Aids Research Group, the theoretical models and conceptual frameworks of decision support and SDM, decision coaching, the International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS) Collaboration, the development toolkit for PDA and the steps for implementing decision support. This will serve as an introduction of the SDM research to domestic researchers.

Full-text
Please download the PDF version to read the full text: download
References

1. Michael JB, Susan EL. Shared decision making--pinnacle of patient-centered care[J]. N Engl J Med, 2012, 366(9): 780-781. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp1109283.

2. Hamilton DW. Shared decision making asks patients to share their aims and values for treatment[J]. BMJ, 2014, 348: g1435. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.g1435.

3. Hoffmann TC, Montori VM, Del Mar C. The connection between evidence-based medicine and shared decision making[J]. JAMA, 2014, 312(13): 1295-1296. DOI: 10.10 01/jama.2014.10186.

4. Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango)[J]. Soc Sci Med, 1997, 44(5): 681-692. DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00221-3.

5. Makoul G, Clayman ML. An integrative model of shared decision making in medical encounters[J]. Patient Educ Couns, 2006, 60(3): 301-312. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2005. 06.010.

6. The Ottawa Patient Decision Aids Research Group. Patient decision aids[EB/OL]. (2015-6-7)[Access on 2020-6-23]. https://decisionaid.ohri.ca/index.html. 

7. Agoritsas T, Heen AF, Brandt L, et al. Decision aids that really promote shared decision making: the pace quickens[J]. BMJ, 2015, 350: g7624. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.g7624.

8. Wieringa TH, Rodriguez-Gutierrez R, Spencer-Bonilla G, et al. Decision aids that facilitate elements of shared decision making in chronic illnesses: a systematic review[J]. Syst Rev, 2019, 8(1): 121-129. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-019-1034-4.

9. Stacey D, Légaré F, Lewis KB. Patient decision aids to engage adults in treatment or screening decisions[J]. JAMA, 2017, 318(7): 657-658. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2017.10289.

10.  余绍福, 王云云, 邓通, 等. 医患共同决策系列之一：医患共同决策的国内外发展现状[J]. 医学新知, 2020, 30(2): 159-167. DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1004- 5511.2020.02.11. [Yu SF, Wang YY, Deng T, et al. First in the series of shared decision making: development status of shared decision making at home and abroad[J]. Yixue Xinzhi Zazhi, 2020, 30(2): 159-167.]

11.  O'ConnorA, O'Brien-Pallas LL. Decisional conflict In McFarland GK , McFarlane EA , eds[M]. Toronto, ON: Nursing Diagnosis and Intervention, 1989.

12.  The Ottawa Patient Decision Aids Research Group. Patient decision aids: about us[EB/OL]. (2014-8-20)[Access on 2020-6-23]. https://decisionaid.ohri.ca/about.html.

13.  Légaré F, Stacey D, Graham ID, et al. Advancing theories, models and measurement for an interprofessional approach to shared decision making in primary care: a study protocol[J]. BMC Health Serv Res, 2008, 8(1): 2-9. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-2.

14.  Stacey D, Légaré F, Pouliot S, et al. Shared decision making models to inform an interprofessional perspective on decision making: a theory analysis[J]. Patient Educ Couns, 2010, 80(2): 164-172. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2009. 10.015. 

15.  Légaré F, Stacey D, Pouliot S, et al. Interprofessionalism and shared decision-making in primary care: a stepwise approach towards a new model[J]. J Interprof Care, 2011, 25(1): 18-25. DOI: 10.3109/13561820.2010.490502.

16.  Légaré F, Stacey D, Brière N, et al. A conceptual framework for interprofessional shared decision making in home care: protocol for a feasibility study[J]. BMC Health Serv Res, 2011, 11: 23-29. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-23. 

17.  Légaré F, Stacey D, Gagnon S, et al. Validating a conceptual model for an inter-professional approach to shared decision making: a mixed methods study[J]. J Eval Clin Pract, 2011, 17(4): 554-564. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01515.x.

18.  Annette O'Connor. Ottawa decision support framework: historical perspective[EB/OL]. (2015-6-17)[Access on 2020-6-23]. https://decisionaid.ohri.ca/docs/develop/ODSF%20Annette%20O'Connor%20Quebec%202019.pptx.

19.  Stacey D, Légaré F, Boland L, et al. 20th anniversary Ottawa decision support framework: part 3 overview of systematic reviews and updated framework[J]. Med Decis Making, 2020, 40(3): 379-398. DOI: 10. 1177/0272989X20911870.

20.  Hoefel L, O'Connor AM, Lewis KB, et al. 20th anniversary update of the Ottawa decision support framework: part 1 a systematic review of the decisional needs of people making health or social decisions[J]. Med Decis Making, 2020, 40(5): 555-581. DOI: 10.1177/0272989X20936209. 

21.  Hoefel L, Lewis KB, O'Connor A, et al. 20th anniversary update of the ottawa decision support framework: part 2 subanalysis of a systematic review of patient decision aids[J]. Med Decis Making, 2020, 40(4): 522-539. DOI: 10.1177/0272989X20924645.  

22.  Garvelink MM, Boland L, Klein K, et al. Decisional conflict scale findings among patients and surrogates making health decisions: part ii of an anniversary review[J]. Med Decis Making, 2019, 39(4): 315-326. DOI: 10.1177/0272989X19851346.

23.  Stacey D, Murray MA, Légaré F, et al. Decision coaching to support shared decision making: a framework, evidence, and implications for nursing practice, education, and policy[J]. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs, 2008, 5(1): 25-35. DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-6787.2007.00108.x.

24.  The Ottawa Patient Decision Aids Research Group. Ottawa personal decision guide[EB/OL]. (2015-6-17)[Access on 2020-6-23]. https://decisionaid.ohri.ca/docs/das/OPDG.pdf.

25.  Elwyn G, O'Connor A, Stacey D, et al. Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process[J]. BMJ, 2006, 333(7565): 417-422. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.38926.629329.AE.

26.  International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS) Collaboration. IPDAS Versions & Use [EB/OL]. [Access on 2020-6-23]. http://ipdas.ohri.ca/using.html. 

27.  牟玮, 陆翠, 王云云, 等. 患者决策辅助工具国际标准4.0版的引进与评估[J]. 医学与哲学, 2019, 40(18): 11-17. DOI: 10.12014/j.issn.1002-0772.2019.18.03. [Mu W, Lu C, Wang YY, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and assessment of the international patient decision aids standards v4.0 for chinese version[J]. Medicine and Philosophy, 2019, 40(18): 11-17.]

28.  The Ottawa Patient Decision Aids Research Group. Patient decision aids: development toolkit[EB/OL]. (2019-12-10) [Access on 2020-6-23]. https://decisionaid.ohri.ca/resources.html.

29.  The Ottawa Patient Decision Aids Research Group. Patient decision aids: implementation toolkit[EB/OL]. (2015-6-17)[Access on 2020-6-23]. https://decisionaid.ohri.ca/implement.html.

30.  The Ottawa Patient Decision Aids Research Group. patient decision aids: decision aid library inventory (DALI)[EB/OL]. (2015-6-17)[Access on 2020-6-23]. https://decisionaid.ohri.ca/cochinvent.php. 

31.  The Ottawa Patient Decision Aids Research Group. Patient decision aids: minimal inclusion criteria[EB/OL]. (2015-6-17)[Access on 2020-6-23]. https://decisionaid.ohri.ca/criteria.html. 

32.  The Ottawa Patient Decision Aids Research Group. New decision support tools [EB/OL]. [Access on 2020-6-23]. https://decisionaid.ohri.ca/.

Popular Papers
© 2022 - 2024 Zhongnan Medical Journal Press of Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University|Support: Yufu Technology
About NM | Contact us