Emotional regulation is an adaptive process through which individuals respond to external or internal stimuli. Impairments in emotional regulation are closely associated with a range of mental health problems, including depression and anxiety disorders, which not only severely disrupt daily functioning and social interactions but also impose substantial burdens on families and society. At present, effective interventions for emotional regulation disorders remain limited, and existing treatments often show unstable therapeutic outcomes and marked individual variability. Electroencephalographic neurofeedback(EEG-NF) is an emerging noninvasive neuromodulation technique characterized by safety, noninvasiveness, and minimal side effects, and has therefore attracted increasing attention in the application of emotional regulation. This review focuses on the core mechanisms underlying EEG-NF modulation of emotion, as well as its clinical applications in common emotion-related disorders such as anxiety, depression, and autism spectrum disorder, to provide a theoretical foundation for the development of precise interventions for emotional regulation disorders.
HomeArticlesVol 36,2026 No.6Detail
Circuit mechanism and network reorganization of electroencephalographic neurofeedback on emotional disorders
Published on Jul. 02, 2026Total Views: 66 timesTotal Downloads: 20 timesDownloadMobile
- Abstract
- Full-text
- References
Abstract
Full-text
References
1. CreswellC, ViolatoM, FairbanksH, et al. Clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of brief guided parent-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy and solution-focused brief therapy for treatment of childhood anxiety disorders: a randomised controlled trial[J]. Lancet Psychiat, 2017, 4(7): 529-539. doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(17)30149-9
2. OlatunjiBO, BergHE, ZhaoZ. Emotion regulation of fear and disgust: differential effects of reappraisal and suppression[J]. Cogn Emot, 2017, 31(2): 403-410. doi:10.1080/02699931.2015.1110117
3. HydeJ, RyanKM, WatersAM. Psychophysiological markers of fear and anxiety[J]. Curr Psychiatry Rep, 2019, 21(7): 56. doi:10.1007/s11920-019-1036-x
4. OwolabiMO, LeonardiM, BassettiC, et al. Global synergistic actions to improve brain health for human development[J]. Nat Rev Neurol, 2023, 19(6): 371-383. doi:10.1038/s41582-023-00808-z
5. MoloudR, SaeedY, MahmonirH, et al. Cognitive-behavioral group therapy in major depressive disorder with focus on self-esteem and optimism: an interventional study[J]. BMC Psychiatry, 2022, 22: 299. doi:10.1186/s12888-022-03918-y
6. JamiesonAJ, HarrisonBJ, RaziA, et al. Rostral anterior cingulate network effective connectivity in depressed adolescents and associations with treatment response in a randomized controlled trial[J]. Neuropsychopharmacol, 2022, 47(6): 1240-1248. doi:10.1038/s41386-021-01214-z
7. MiskowiakKW, MacoveanuJ, JørgensenMB, et al. Effect of electroconvulsive therapy on neural response to affective pictures: a randomized, sham-controlled fMRI study[J]. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol, 2018, 28(8): 915-924. doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2018.05.013
8. MelnikovMY. The current evidence levels for biofeedback and neurofeedback interventions in treating depression: a narrative review[J]. Neural Plast, 2021, 2021: 1-31. doi:10.1155/2021/8878857
9. RazzaLB, MoffaAH, MorenoML, et al. A systematic review and Meta-analysis on placebo response to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for depression trials[J]. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry, 2018, 81: 105-113. doi:10.1016/j.pnpbp.2017.10.016
10. TsaiPC, AkpanA, TangKT, et al. Brain computer interfaces for cognitive enhancement in older people-challenges and applications: a systematic review[J]. BMC Geriatr, 2025, 25(1): 36. doi:10.1186/s12877-025-05676-4
11. Fernández-alvarezJ, GrassiM, ColomboD, et al. Efficacy of bio- and neurofeedback for depression: a Meta-analysis[J]. Psychol Med, 2022, 52(2): 201-216. doi:10.1017/s0033291721004396
12. Enriquez-geppertS, HusterRJ, HerrmannCS. EEG-neurofeedback as a tool to modulate cognition and behavior: a review tutorial[J]. Front Hum Neurosci, 2017, 11: 51. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2017.00051
13. LinFL, SunCK, ChengYS, et al. Additive effects of EEG neurofeedback on medications for ADHD: a systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. Sci Rep, 2022, 12(1): 20401. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-23015-0
14. AbdianH, RezaeiM, EskandariZ, et al. The effect of quantitative electroencephalography-based neurofeedback therapy on anxiety, depression, and emotion regulation in people with generalized anxiety disorder[J]. Basic Clin Neurosci, 2021, 12(2): 281-290. doi:10.32598/bcn.12.2.2378.1
15. TschentscherN, TafelmaierJC, WollC FJ, et al. The clinical impact of real-time fMRI neurofeedback on emotion regulation: a systematic review[J]. Brain Sci, 2024, 14(7): 700. doi:10.3390/brainsci14070700
16. GodetA, SerrandY, FortierA, et al. Subjective feeling of control during fNIRS-based neurofeedback targeting the DL-PFC is related to neural activation determined with short-channel correction[J]. PLoS One, 2023, 18(8): e0290005. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0290005
17. GurevitchG, LubianikerN, MarkovitsT, et al. Amygdala self-neuromodulation capacity as a window for process-related network recruitment[J]. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 2024, 379(1915): 20240186. doi:10.1098/rstb.2024.0186
18. GoldwayN, JalonI, KeynanJN, et al. Feasibility and utility of amygdala neurofeedback[J]. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 2022, 138: 104694. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104694
19. GálberM, NagySA, OrsiG, et al. Hippocampal subfield and amygdala volumes are associated with difficulties in emotion regulation of depressed patients with a history of childhood maltreatment[J]. Front Psychiatry, 2025, 16: 1641745. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1641745
20. ZhangL, OpmeerEM, Van der MeerL, et al. Altered frontal-amygdala effective connectivity during effortful emotion regulation in bipolar disorder[J]. Bipolar Disord, 2018, 20(4): 349-358. doi:10.1111/bdi.12611
21. AskovicM, SohN, ElhindiJ, et al. Neurofeedback for post-traumatic stress disorder: systematic review and Meta-analysis of clinical and neurophysiological outcomes[J]. Eur J Psychotraumatol, 2023, 14(2): 2257435. doi:10.1080/20008066.2023.2257435
22. ZamfiracheF, PrundaruG, DumitruC, et al. Frontal transcranial direct current stimulation in moderate to severe depression: clinical and neurophysiological findings from a pilot study[J]. Brain Sci, 2025, 15(6): 540. doi:10.3390/brainsci15060540
23. BrzezickaA, KamińskiJ, KamińskaOK, et al. Frontal EEG alpha band asymmetry as a predictor of reasoning deficiency in depressed people[J]. Cogn Emot, 2017, 31(5): 868-878. doi:10.1080/02699931.2016.1170669
24. DehghaniA, Soltanian-zadehH, Hossein-zadehGA. Probing fMRI brain connectivity and activity changes during emotion regulation by EEG neurofeedback[J]. Front Hum Neurosci, 2023, 16: 988890. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2022.988890
25. WangJ, LiQ, LiZ, et al. EEG-based multivariate pattern analysis reveals the control mechanisms of emotion regulation through distancing[J]. Int J Clin Health Psychol, 2024, 24(1): 100423. doi:10.1016/j.ijchp.2023.100423
26. LinhartováP, LátalováA, KóšaB, et al. fMRI neurofeedback in emotion regulation: a literature review[J]. Neuroimage, 2019, 193: 75-92. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.03.011
27. MarzbaniH, MaratebHR, MansourianM. Neurofeedback: a comprehensive review on system design, methodology and clinical applications[J]. Basic Clin Neurosci, 2016, 7(2): 143-158. doi:10.15412/j.bcn.03070208
28. SunS, YuH, YuR, et al. Functional connectivity between the amygdala and prefrontal cortex underlies processing of emotion ambiguity[J]. Transl Psychiatry, 2023, 13(1): 334. doi:10.1038/s41398-023-02625-w
29. McewenBS, NascaC, GrayJD. Stress effects on neuronal structure: hippocampus, amygdala, and prefrontal cortex[J]. Neuropsychopharmacol, 2016, 41(1): 3-23. doi:10.1038/npp.2015.171
30. DehghaniA, Soltanian-zadehH, Hossein-zadehGA. Neural modulation enhancement using connectivity-based EEG neurofeedback with simultaneous fMRI for emotion regulation[J]. Neuroimage, 2023, 279: 120320. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120320
31. RobertsH, SchreinerMW, PociusS, et al. State rumination predicts inhibitory control failures and dysregulation of default, salience, and cognitive control networks in youth at risk of depressive relapse: findings from the RuMeChange trial[J]. J Affect Disord Rep, 2024, 16: 100729. doi:10.1016/j.jadr.2024.100729
32. LiebermanJM, RabellinoD, DensmoreM, et al. Posterior cingulate cortex targeted real-time fMRI neurofeedback recalibrates functional connectivity with the amygdala, posterior insula, and default-mode network in PTSD[J]. Brain Behav, 2023, 13(3): e2883.
33. RyanNP, CatroppaC, WardSC, et al. Association of neurostructural biomarkers with secondary attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptom severity in children with traumatic brain injury: a prospective cohort study[J]. Psychol Med, 2023, 53(11): 5291-5300. doi:10.1017/s0033291722002598
34. RanceM, WalshC, SukhodolskyDG, et al. Time course of clinical change following neurofeedback[J]. Neuroimage, 2018, 181: 807-813. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.05.001
35. MennellaR, PatronE, PalombaD. Frontal alpha asymmetry neurofeedback for the reduction of negative affect and anxiety[J]. Behav Res Ther, 2017, 92: 32-40. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2017.02.002
36. MoradiA, PouladiF, PishvaN, et al. Treatment of anxiety disorder with neurofeedback: case study[J]. Procedia Soc Behav Sci, 2011, 30: 103-107. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.10.021
37. 郭晓琳, 韩海斌, 王婷婷, 等. 艾司西酞普兰联合脑电生物反馈对青少年抑郁症疗效[J]. 青岛大学学报(医学版), 2025, 61(4): 588-592.GuoXL, HanHB, WangTT, et al. Therapeutic effects of escitalopram combined with electroencephalographic biofeedback in adolescents with depression[J]. Journal of Qingdao University(Medical Sciences), 2025, 61(4): 588-592.
38. 单筱雯. 脑电生物反馈联合丁螺环酮片治疗广泛性焦虑障碍患者的效果[J]. 中国民康医学,2023,35(13):39-42. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-0369.2023.13.012ShanXW. The effect of electroencephalogram biofeedback combined with dinoloxone tablets in treating patients with generalized anxiety disorder[J]. Chinese Community Medicine, 2023, 35(13): 39-42. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-0369.2023.13.012
39. EserA, ErdoğanSB. Decoding basic emotional states through integration of an fNIRS-based brain-computer interface with supervised learning algorithms[J]. PLoS One, 2025, 20(7): e0325850. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0325850
40. HopwoodM. Anxiety symptoms in patients with major depressive disorder: commentary on prevalence and clinical implications[J]. Neurol Ther, 2023, 12(S1): 5-12. doi:10.1007/s40120-023-00469-6
41. KrawutschkeM, TeufelM, SchmidtK, et al. Neurofeedback reduces P300 amplitudes to intensely emotive pictures in depressed cancer patients[J]. Clin EEG Neurosci, 2025, 56(3): 217-229. doi:10.1177/15500594241287961
42. TrambaioilliLR, KohlSH, LindenDEJ, et al. Neurofeedback training in major depressive disorder: a systematic review of clinical efficacy, study quality and reporting practices[J]. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 2021, 125: 33-56. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.02.015
43. WangSY, LinIM, FanSY, et al. The effects of alpha asymmetry and high-beta down-training neurofeedback for patients with the major depressive disorder and anxiety symptoms[J]. J Affect Disord, 2019, 257: 287-296. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2019.07.026
44. 李春梅. 帕罗西汀联合生物反馈治疗抑郁症的临床效果研究[J]. 中国现代药物应用, 2025, 19(15): 108-110.LiCM. Study on the clinical effect of paroxetine combined with biofeedback in the treatment of depression[J]. Chinese Journal of Modern Drug Application, 2025, 19(15): 108-110
45. TostiB, CorradoS, ManconeS, et al. Neurofeedback training protocols in sports: a systematic review of recent advances in performance, anxiety, and emotional regulation[J]. Brain Sci, 2024, 14(10): 1036. doi:10.3390/brainsci14101036
46. FietzJ, AuerG, PlenerP, et al. Empathy and event related potentials before and after EEG based neurofeedback training in autistic adolescents[J]. Sci Rep, 2025, 15(1): 30824. doi:10.1038/s41598-025-16767-y
47. ThompsonL, ThompsonM, ReidA. Neurofeedback outcomes in clients with asperger's syndrome[J]. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback, 2010, 35(1): 63-81. doi:10.1007/s10484-009-9120-3
48. KangJ, LvS, LiY, et al. The effects of neurofeedback training on behavior and brain functional networks in children with autism spectrum disorder[J]. Behav Brain Res, 2025, 481: 115425. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2025.115425
49. CobenR, LindenM, MyersTE. Neurofeedback for autistic spectrum disorder: a review of the literature[J]. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback, 2010, 35(1): 83-105. doi:10.1007/s10484-009-9117-y
50. VoigtJD, MosierM, TendlerA. Systematic review and Meta-analysis of neurofeedback and its effect on posttraumatic stress disorder[J]. Front Psychiatry, 2024, 15: 1323485. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1323485
51. van der KolkBA, HodgdonH, GapenM, et al. A randomized controlled study of neurofeedback for chronic PTSD[J]. PLoS One, 2016, 11(12): e0166752. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0166752
52. NicholsonAA, DensmoreM, FrewenPA, et al. Homeostatic normalization of alpha brain rhythms within the default-mode network and reduced symptoms in post-traumatic stress disorder following a randomized controlled trial of electroencephalogram neurofeedback[J]. Brain Commun, 2023, 5(2): fcad068. doi:10.1093/braincomms/fcad068
53. NicholsonAA, RosT, DensmoreM, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of alpha-rhythm EEG neurofeedback in posttraumatic stress disorder: a preliminary investigation showing evidence of decreased PTSD symptoms and restored default mode and salience network connectivity using fMRI[J]. Neuroimage Clin, 2020, 28: 102490. doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102490
Popular Papers
-
Analysis of burden of type 2 diabetes mellitus and its attributable risk factors in global and China from 1990 to 2021
Feb. 02, 20267511
-
Meta-integration of qualitative studies on the inner experience and nursing needs of breast cancer patients during radiotherapy and chemotherapy
Feb. 02, 20266672
-
Detection value of umbilical artery pulsatility index in growth-restricted fetuses
Feb. 02, 20265578
-
Meta-analysis of the incidence and influencing factors of sleep disorders in patients with coronary heart disease
Feb. 02, 20265484
-
Constructing a depression risk prediction model for elderly people with activities of daily living impairment based on machine learning algorithms
Feb. 02, 20265457
-
The relationship between exercise duration, sleep duration, and depressive symptoms in adults in China: an empirical study based on the CFPS database 2022
Feb. 02, 20265209
-
Application of digital teaching mode in outpatient general practice professional master training
Feb. 02, 20264870
-
Construction of a predictive model of deep vein thrombosis in elderly patients with hip fractures
Feb. 02, 20264807
-
The research progress of fibroblast growth factor 21 in retinal neovascularization diseases
Feb. 02, 20264689
-
Research on living clinical practice guidelines in diabetes mellitus II: summary of key evidence in the development of drug treatment strategies for type 2 diabetes mellitus
Mar. 05, 20264662
-
Efficacy and safety of SOX chemotherapy combined with Sintilimab immunotherapy in treatment of patients with advanced gastric cancer
Feb. 02, 20264590
-
SOX9 promotes ovarian cancer progression through activating ferroptosis via SLC7A11/GPX4 pathway
Feb. 02, 20264589
-
AURKA promotes Temozolomide resistance in glioma cells by inhibiting ferroptosis through activation of the JAK2/STAT3 pathway
Feb. 02, 20264551
-
Research on living clinical practice guidelines in diabetes mellitus Ⅰ: a qualitative study of public-oriented web-based knowledge platform and guideline dissemination
Feb. 02, 20264524
-
Correlation between epidemiological characteristics and meteorological factors in critically ill patients with respiratory failure
Feb. 02, 20264506
Welcome to visit Zhongnan Medical Journal Press Series journal website!