Welcome to visit Zhongnan Medical Journal Press Series journal website!

Digital health interventions on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a scoping review

Published on Jul. 25, 2025Total Views: 121 timesTotal Downloads: 33 timesDownloadMobile

Author: WANG Wenya 1 SHI Lanjun 1 HU Jing 2 LIAO Xing 1

Affiliation: 1. Institute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100700, China 2. Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100010, China

Keywords: Digital health interventions Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Scoping review

DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1004-5511.202410147

Reference: Wang WJ, Shi LJ, Hu J, Liao X. Digital health interventions on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a scoping review[J]. Yixue Xinzhi Zazhi, 2025, 35(7): 731-741. DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1004-5511.202410147. [Article in Chinese]

  • Abstract
  • Full-text
  • References
Abstract

Objective  This study systematically and comprehensively reviewed the randomized controlled trials (RCT) of digital health interventions (DHIs) applied to patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) both domestically and internationally, demonstrating the current clinical research status of DHIs on COPD.

Methods  The databases of CNKI, WanFang, VIP, SinoMed, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched from the inception to 12 March 2025. The retrieved literature was screened and analyzed based on the normative process, and the results were presented through visualization methods.

Results  A total of 110 articles were included ultimately, of which 74 in English and 36 in Chinese, involving 104 studies. The earliest one was published in 2005, and the overall volume of literature showed an increasing trend. The majority of participants were over 50 years of age, the sample size of the studies ranged from 37 to 1,225 cases, with the largest number of articles (30.91%) ranging from 80 to 120 cases. A total of 59 articles had an intervention duration of 6 months or less, and the follow- up time was usually within 6 months (56.36%). The top 3 DHIs platform pathways in terms of frequency of use were telephone (64.55%), platform systems (63.64%), and video (conference) (51.82%). The providers of DHIs were mainly clinical medical staff, and the intervention guidance content was mainly about medication (73.64%) and rehabilitation exercises (62.73%). Most literature supported that DHIs improved laboratory indicators, self- efficacy, exercise tolerance, compliance, disease progression and cognitive function in COPD patients, while there was controversy over psychological status and health economic assessment.

Conclusion  DHIs have potential development as a disease management tool for COPD patients. At present, intervention guidance mainly focuses on medication and lung rehabilitation exercise,  with a lack of attention to smoking cessation. Future research needs to improve the level of  intelligent application and implement report standards of DHIs, strengthen multidisciplinary and high-level team building, conduct high-quality clinical research, and provide evidence to support the application and promotion of DHIs in COPD patients.

Full-text
Please download the PDF version to read the full text: download
References

1.World Health Organization. Global strategy on digital health 2020-2025[EB/OL]. [2025-03-23]. https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/344249.

2.WHO guideline: recommendations on digital interventions for health system strengthening: evidence and recommendations[EB/OL]. (2019-01-01) [2025-03-23]. https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/311980.

3.Gehr S, Balasubramaniam NK, Russmann C. Use of mobile diagnostics and digital clinical trials in cardiology[J]. Nat Med, 2023, 29(4): 781-784. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-023-02263-1.

4.Dahne J, Player MS, Strange C, et al. Proactive electronic visits for smoking cessation and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease screening in primary care: randomized controlled trial of feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy[J]. J Med Internet Res, 2022, 24(8): e38663. DOI: 10.2196/38663.

5.GBD 2021 Causes of Death Collaborators. Global burden of 288 causes of death and life expectancy decomposition in 204 countries and territories and 811 subnational locations, 1990-2021: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2021[J]. Lancet, 2024, 403(10440): 2100-2132. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00367-2.

6.Wang C, Xu J, Yang L, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in China (the China pulmonary health [CPH] study): a national cross-sectional study[J]. Lancet, 2018, 391(10131): 1706-1717. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30841-9.

7.Adeloye D, Song P, Zhu Y, et al. Global, regional, and national prevalence of, and risk factors for, chronic  obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in 2019: a systematic review and modelling  analysis[J]. Lancet Respir Med, 2022, 10(5): 447-458. DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00511-7.

8.Labaki WW, Rosenberg SR. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease[J]. Ann Intern Med, 2020, 173(3): ITC17-ITC32. DOI: 10.7326/AITC202008040.

9.Rabe KF, Watz H. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease[J]. Lancet, 2017, 389(10082): 1931-1940. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31222-9.

10.Janjua S, Banchoff E, Threapleton C, et al. Digital interventions for the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2021, 4(4): CD013246. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013246.pub2.

11.Lippi L, Turco A, Folli A, et al. Technological advances and digital solutions to improve quality of life in older adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review[J]. Aging Clin Exp Res, 2023, 35(5): 953-968. DOI: 10.1007/s40520-023-02381-3.

12.McLean S, Nurmatov U, Liu JL, et al. Telehealthcare for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: cochrane review and Meta-analysis[J]. Br J Gen Pract, 2012, 62(604): e739-e749. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp12X658269.

13.Hansen H, Bieler T, Beyer N, et al. Supervised pulmonary tele-rehabilitation versus pulmonary rehabilitation in severe COPD: a randomised multicentre trial[J]. Thorax, 2020, 75(5): 413-421. DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2019-214246.

14.Soriano JB, García-Río F, Vázquez-Espinosa E, et al. A multicentre, randomized controlled trial of telehealth for the management of COPD[J]. Respir Med, 2018, 144: 74-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2018.10.008.

15.Jones DS, Podolsky SH. The history and fate of the gold standard[J]. Lancet, 2015, 385(9977): 1502-1503. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60742-5.

16.Levac D, Colquhoun H, O'Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology[J]. Implement Sci, 2010, 5(1): 69. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-69.

17.Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation[J]. Ann Intern Med, 2018, 169(7): 467-473. DOI: 10.7326/M18-0850.

18.Sterne J, Savović J, Page MJ, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials[J]. BMJ, 2019, 366: l4898. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.l4898.

19.Schou L, Østergaard B, Rydahl-Hansen S, et al. A randomised trial of telemedicine-based treatment versus conventional hospitalisation in patients with severe COPD and exacerbation-effect on self-reported outcome[J]. J Telemed Telecare, 2013, 19(3): 160-165 DOI: 10.1177/1357633X13483255.

20.Udsen FW, Lilholt PH, Hejlesen O, et al. Cost-effectiveness of telehealthcare to patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: results from the danish telecare north' cluster-randomised trial[J]. BMJ Open, 2017, 7(5): e014616. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014616.

21.Køpfli ML, Børgesen S, Jensen MS, et al. Effect of telemonitoring on quality of life for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease-a randomized controlled trial[J]. Chron Respir Dis, 2023, 20: 14799731231157771. DOI: 10.1177/14799731231157771.

22.Andersen FD, Trolle C, Pedersen AR, et al. Effect of telemonitoring on readmissions for acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomized clinical trial[J]. J Telemed Telecare, 2023, 30(9): 1417-1424. DOI: 10.1177/1357633X221150279.

23.Jakobsen AS, Laursen LC, Rydahl-Hansen S, et al. Home-based telehealth hospitalization for exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: findings from "the virtual hospital" trial[J]. Telemed J E Health, 2015, 21(5): 364-373. DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2014.0098.

24.Lilholt PH, Udsen FW, Ehlers L, et al. Telehealthcare for patients suffering from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: effects on health-related quality of life: results from the Danish 'TeleCare North' cluster-randomised trial[J]. BMJ Open, 2017, 7(5): e014587. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014587.

25.Schou L, Østergaard B, Rasmussen LS, et al. Telemedicine-based treatment versus hospitalization in patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and exacerbation: effect on cognitive function. a randomized clinical trial[J]. Telemed J E Health, 2014, 20(7): 640-646. DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2013.0224.

26.Emme C, Mortensen EL, Rydahl-Hansen S, et al. The impact of virtual admission on self-efficacy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease-a randomised clinical trial[J]. J Clin Nurs, 2014, 23(21-22): 3124-3137. DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12553.

27.Hæsum LKE, Ehlers LH, Hejlesen OK. The long-term effects of using telehomecare technology on functional health literacy: results from a randomized trial[J]. Public Health, 2017, 150: 43-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2017.05.002.

28.Wong KW, Wong FK, Chan MF. Effects of nurse-initiated telephone follow-up on self-efficacy among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease[J]. J Adv Nurs, 2005, 49(2): 210-222. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03280.x.

29.Lievevrouw E, Marelli L, Van Hoyweghen I. The FDA's standard-making process for medical digital health technologies: co-producing technological and organizational innovation[J]. BioSocieties, 2022, 17(3): 549-576. DOI: 10.1057/s41292-021-00232-w.

30.唐丽安, 王自秀, 刘剑梅, 等. 综合随访模式在慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中的应用效果观察[J]. 中华现代护理杂志, 2022, 28(29): 4093-4097. [Tang LA, Wang ZX, Liu JM, et al. Effect of comprehensive follow-up mode in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease[J]. Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing, 2022, 28(29): 4093-4097] DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115682-20211020-04743.

31.Demeyer H, Louvaris Z, Frei A, et al. Physical activity is increased by a 12-week semiautomated telecoaching programme in patients with COPD: a multicentre randomised controlled trial[J]. 2017, 72(5): 415-423. DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-209026.

32.吴迪, 殷稚飞, 陈潇冰, 等. 远程居家监控八段锦对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的影响[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2024, 39(5): 628-633. [Wu D, Yin ZF, Chen XB, et al. Efficacy of remote home-monitored Baduanjin in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease[J]. Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 2024, 39(5): 628-633] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1242. 2024.05.003.

33.Jiang W, Jin X, Du C, et al. Internet of things-based management versus standard management of home noninvasive ventilation in COPD patients with hypercapnic chronic respiratory failure: a multicentre randomized controlled non-inferiority trial[J]. EClinicalMedicine, 2024, 70: 102518. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102518.

34.AMA Digital Health Research[Z]. New York: Aspen Publishers, Inc, 2023: 40, 9-10.

35.Paré G, Poba-Nzaou P, Sicotte C, et al. Comparing the costs of home telemonitoring and usual care of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients: a randomized controlled trial[J]. European Research in Telemedicine, 2013, 2(2): 35-47. DOI: 10.1016/j.eurtel.2013.05.001.

36.王岚, 张清, 刘素彦, 等. 电子健康档案对社区慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者应用效果的研究[J]. 中国全科医学, 2012, 15(4): 443-446. [Wang L, Zhang Q, Liu SY, et al. Intervention effect of electronic health record on community patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease[J]. Chinese General Practice, 2012, 15(4): 443-446] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-9572.2012.04.028.

37.Demeyer H, Louvaris Z, Frei A, et al. Physical activity is increased by a 12-week semiautomated telecoaching programme in patients with COPD: a multicentre randomised controlled trial[J]. Thorax, 2017, 72(5): 415-423. DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-209026.

38.彭国庆, 王小梅, 王瑞, 等. 数字健康实施报告规范(iCHECK-DH清单)解读[J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2024, 24(3): 331-338. [Peng GQ, Wang XM, Wang R, et al. An interpretation of the guidelines and checklist for the reporting on digital health implementations (iCHECK-DH)[J]. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2024, 24(3): 331-338.] DOI: 10.7507/1672-2531.202308171.

39.Perrin FC, Babington-Ashaye A, Dietrich D, et al. iCHECK-DH: Guidelines and Checklist for the Reporting on Digital Health  Implementations[J]. J Med Internet Res, 2023, 25: e46694. DOI: 10.2196/46694.

40.Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GH. Measurement of health status. ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference[J]. Control Clin Trials, 1989, 10(4): 407-415. DOI: 10.1016/0197-2456(89)90005-6.

41.Skivington K, Matthews L, Simpson SA, et al. A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of  medical research council guidance[J]. BMJ, 2021, 374: n2061. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n2061.

42.赵燕利, 李莹莹, 李秋芳, 等. 复杂干预的开发与评价: 2021年英国医学研究委员会框架更新解读[J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2023, 23(2): 125-132. [Zhao YL, Li YY, Li QF, et al. A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: interpretation of the 2021 update of Medical Research Council framework[J]. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2023, 23(2): 125-132.] DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115682-20220710-03343.

43.Strauß S. Deep automation bias: how to tackle a wicked problem of AI?[J]. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 2021, 5(2): 18. DOI: 10.3390/bdcc5020018.

44.Wang D, Ding J, Sun A, et al. Artificial intelligence suppression as a strategy to mitigate artificial intelligence automation bias[J]. J Am Med Inform Assoc, 2023, 30(10): 1684-1692. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocad118.

45.Shah A, Hussain-Shamsy N, Strudwick G, et al. Digital health interventions for depression and anxiety among people with chronic conditions: scoping review[J]. J Med Internet Res, 2022, 24(9): e38030. DOI: 10.2196/38030.

46.Stamenova V, Liang K, Yang R, et al. Technology-enabled self-management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with or without asynchronous remote monitoring: randomized controlled trial[J]. J Med Internet Resh, 2020, 22(7): e18598. DOI: 10.2196/18598.

47.Wheaton AG, Liu Y, Croft JB, et al. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and smoking status-united states, 2017[J]. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 2019, 68(24): 533-538. DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6824a1.

48.Sha L, Yang X, Deng R, et al. Automated digital interventions and smoking cessation: systematic review and Meta-analysis relating efficiency to a psychological theory of intervention perspective[J]. J Med Internet Res, 2022, 24(11): e38206. DOI: 10.2196/38206.

49.Mínguez Clemente P, Pascual-Carrasco M, Mata Hernández C, et al. Follow-up with telemedicine in early discharge for COPD exacerbations: randomized clinical trial (TELEMEDCOPD-Trial) [J]. COPD, 2021, 18(1): 62-69. DOI: 10.1080/15412555.2020.1857717.

50.Jiménez-Reguera B, Maroto López E, Fitch S, et al. Development and preliminary evaluation of the effects of an mhealth web-based platform (HappyAir) on adherence to a maintenance program after pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: randomized controlled trial[J]. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth, 2020, 8(7): e18465. DOI: 10.2196/18465.

51.Sung PP, Eric YJL. How should medical researchers respond to false copyright infringement claims?[J]. Sci Ed, 2019, 6(2): 137-141. DOI: 10.6087/kcse.174.