Welcome to visit Zhongnan Medical Journal Press Series journal website!

The impact of laminar flow clean operating room on abdominal surgery: a systematic review and Meta-analysis

Published on Apr. 01, 2026Total Views: 14 timesTotal Downloads: 1 timesDownloadMobile

Author: FU Lu 1 LI Suying 1 LI Xiaolan 1 YAN Min 2

Affiliation: 1. Department of Anesthesiology and Surgery, Jianyang People's Hospital, Jianyang 641400, Sichuan Province, China 2. Department of Infection Management, Jianyang People's Hospital, Jianyang 641400, Sichuan Province, China

Keywords: Laminar flow operating room Abdominal surgery Surgical site infection Airborne bacterial count Meta-analysis

DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1004-5511.202510074

Reference: Fu L, Li SY, Li XL, et al. The impact of laminar flow clean operating room on abdominal surgery: a systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. Yixue Xinzhi Zazhi, 2026, 36(3): 329-334. DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1004-5511.202510074. [Article in Chinese]

  • Abstract
  • Full-text
  • References
Abstract

Objective  To evaluate the application effect of laminar flow clean operating room and ordinary operating room in abdominal surgery.

Method  Search CNKI, WanFang, VIP, PubMed, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library and Embase databases to collect clinical studies on the application of laminar flow clean operating rooms and general operating rooms in abdominal surgery. The search period was from the establishment to July 25, 2025.

Results  A total of 9 studies were included, involving 59,449 patients, showing that compared with a regular operating room, laminar flow clean operating rooms significantly reduced the surgical site infection (SSI) incidence [OR=0.50, 95%CI (0.34, 0.73), P<0.001] and the number of airborne bacteria [MD=-47.32, 95%CI (-66.36, -28.29), P<0.001]. Subgroup analysis showed that laminar flow clean operating rooms more significantly decreased the SSI incidence in patients <60 years old [OR=0.45, 95%CI (0.25, 0.83), P=0.01], patients with surgery duration ≥150 minutes [OR=0.41, 95%CI (0.31, 0.55), P<0.001], and patients with a proportion of grade III/IV surgery ≥50% [OR=0.41, 95%CI (0.21, 0.80), P=0.01]. The decrease in airborne bacterial counts was more significant in the subgroup with less than 10 door openings during surgery [MD=-65.43, 95%CI (-94.47, -36.40), P<0.001].

Conclusion  Current evidence shows that laminar flow clean operating rooms are more effective in preventing SSI and reducing airborne bacterial count during abdominal surgery than regular operating rooms, especially in specific patient populations and surgical conditions.

Full-text
Please download the PDF version to read the full text: download
References

1. Alam R, Figueiredo SM, Balvardi S, et al. Development of a patient-reported outcome measure of recovery after abdominal surgery: a hypothesized conceptual framework[J]. Surg Endosc, 2018, 32(12): 4874-4885.

2. Cheadle WG. Risk factors for surgical site infection[J]. Surg Infect (Larchmt), 2006, 7 Suppl 1: S7-11.

3. Poirot K, Le Roy B, Badrikian L, et al. Skin preparation for abdominal surgery[J]. J Visc Surg, 2018, 155(3): 211-217.

4. Ahmed K, Bashar K, Connelly TT, et al. Reducing surgical site infections in abdominal surgery: are ring retractors effective? a systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. Surg Infect (Larchmt), 2016, 17(2): 138-151.

5. Leaper D, Ousey K. Evidence update on prevention of surgical site infection[J]. Curr Opin Infect Dis, 2015, 28(2): 158-163.

6. Willis MA, Toews I, Soltau SL, et al. Preoperative combined mechanical and oral antibiotic bowel preparation for preventing complications in elective colorectal surgery[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2023, 2(2): Cd014909.

7. Owens CD, Stoessel K. Surgical site infections: epidemiology, microbiology and prevention[J]. J Hosp Infect, 2008, 70 Suppl 2: 3-10.

8. Hastings S, Myles PS, Medcalf RL. Plasmin, immunity, and surgical site infection[J]. J Clin Med, 2021, 10(10): 2070.

9. Liu Z, Dumville JC, Norman G, et al. Intraoperative interventions for preventing surgical site infection: an overview of Cochrane reviews[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2018, 2(2): Cd012653.

10. Haslam KR. Laminar air-flow air conditioning in the operating room: a review[J]. Anesth Analg, 1974, 53(2): 194-199.

11. Dharan S, Pittet D. Environmental controls in operating theatres[J]. J Hosp Infect, 2002, 51(2): 79-84.

12. McHugh SM, Hill AD, Humphreys H. Laminar airflow and the prevention of surgical site infection. More harm than good?[J]. Surgeon, 2015, 13(1): 52-58.

13. Bridges E, Whitney J, Metter D, et al. Prevention of pressure injuries during military aeromedical evacuation or prolonged field care: a randomized trial[J]. Nurs Outlook, 2022, 70(6 Suppl 2): S115-S126.

14. Breier AC, Brandt C, Sohr D, et al. Laminar airflow ceiling size: no impact on infection rates following hip and knee prosthesis[J]. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol, 2011, 32(11): 1097-1102.

15. Bosanquet DC, Jones CN, Gill N, et al. Laminar flow reduces cases of surgical site infections in vascular patients[J]. Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 2013, 95(1): 15-19.

16. Dai R, Liu S, Li Q, et al. A systematic review and Meta-analysis of indoor bioaerosols in hospitals: the influence of heating, ventilation, and air conditioning[J]. PLoS One, 2021, 16(12): e0259996.

17. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and Meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement[J]. BMJ (Clinical research ed), 2009, 339: b2535.

18. Hong W, Zhang X, Liu Z, et al. MRI assessment of the relationship between cortical morphological features and hemiparetic motor-related outcomes in chronic subcortical stroke patients[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2023, 58(2): 571-580.

19. Lee YH. An overview of Meta-analysis for clinicians[J]. Korean J Intern Med, 2018, 33(2): 277-283.

20. Zeng X, Zhang Y, Kwong JS, et al. The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and Meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review[J]. J Evid Based Med, 2015, 8(1): 2-10.

21. 曾宪涛, S.W.Kwong J, 田国祥, 等. Meta分析系列之二: Meta分析的软件[J]. 中国循证心血管医学杂志, 2012, 4(2): 89-91. [Zeng XT, S.W.Kwong J, Tian GX, et al. Meta analysis series 2: Meta-analysis software[J]. Chinese Journal of Evidence Based Cardiovascular Medicine, 2012, 4(2): 89-91.]

22. 杨娟, 郑青山. Meta分析的统计学方法[J]. 中国临床药理学与治疗学, 2005, 10(11): 1309-1314. [Yang J, Zheng QS. Statistical methods for Meta-analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2005, 10(11): 1309-1314.]

23. Choi JH, Grimsley EA, Read MD, et al. Meta-analysis in surgical research: methodology and statistical application[J]. Am Surg, 2024, 90(11): 3092-3101.

24. Brandt C, Hott U, Sohr D, et al. Operating room ventilation with laminar airflow shows no protective effect on the surgical site infection rate in orthopedic and abdominal surgery[J]. Ann Surg, 2008, 248(5): 695-700.

25. Jeong SJ, Ann HW, Kim JK, et al. Incidence and risk factors for surgical site infection after gastric surgery: a multicenter prospective cohort study[J]. Infect Chemother, 2013, 45(4): 422-430.

26. 成昌霞, 陈兆杰, 周学颖, 等. 两种手术室空气质量对腹部手术切口感染的影响[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志, 2009, 19(24): 3360-3361. [Cheng CX, Chen ZJ, Zhou XY, et al. The impact of two types of operating room air quality on abdominal surgical incision infection[J]. Chinese Journal of Hospital Infection, 2009, 19(24): 3360-3361.]

27. 成昌霞, 周学颖, 李福玮, 等. 手术时间对手术切口感染影响的研究[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志, 2016, 26(5): 1111-1112, 1123. [Cheng CX, Zhou XY, Li FW, et al. Study on the influence of surgical time on surgical incision infection[J]. Chinese Journal of Hospital Infection, 2016, 26(5): 1111-1112, 1123.]

28. 傅小芳, 刘金妹, 顾崎, 等. 普通手术室和层流洁净手术室对手术切口感染率的影响[J]. 中国感染控制杂志, 2007, 6(1): 24-26. [Fu XF, Liu JM, Gu Q, et al. The impact of ordinary operating rooms and laminar flow clean operating rooms on surgical incision infection rates[J]. Chinese Journal of Infection Control, 2007, 6(1): 24-26. ]

29. 黄彩燕, 黎春慧. 层流净化手术室对手术感染的预防效果分析 [J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2015, (1): 53-56. [Huang CY, Li CH. Preventive effect of laminar flow operating room for surgical site infections[J]. Chinese Journal of Experimental and Clinical Infectious Diseases (Electronic Edition), 2015, (1): 53-56.]

30. 吴亚林, 王航平, 许爱珍, 等. 腹部切口感染手术室环境因素分析与预防措施[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志, 2014, (7): 1728-1729, 1735. [Wu YL, Wang HP, Xu AZ, et al. Analysis of operating room environmental factors and preventive measures for abdominal incision infection[J]. Chinese Journal of Hospital Infection, 2014, (7): 1728-1729, 1735.]

31. 肖越. 层流手术室预防手术切口感染的效果[J]. 实用临床医学, 2019, 20(4): 98-99. [Xiao Y. The effect of laminar flow operating room on preventing surgical incision infection[J]. Practical Clinical Medicine, 2019, 20(4): 98-99.]

32. Botzenhart K, Hoppenkamps G. Wound contamination in conventionally air-conditioned operating rooms as compared to laminar-flow-operating-rooms (author's transl)[J]. Zentralbl Bakteriol B, 1978, 167(1-2): 29-37.

33. Pinder EM, Bottle A, Aylin P, et al. Does laminar flow ventilation reduce the rate of infection? an observational study of trauma in England[J]. Bone Joint J, 2016, 98-b(9): 1262-1269.

34. Özdemir ED, Uslu Y, Karabacak U, et al. Pressure injuries in the operating room: who are at risk?[J]. J Wound Care, 2023, 32(Sup7a): cxxviii-cxxxvi.

35. Beckert S, Struller F, Horvath P, et al. Overall morbidity but not mortality is increased in elderly patients following cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC[J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2015, 400(6): 693-698.

36. Wanta BT, Glasgow AE, Habermann EB, et al. Operating room traffic as a modifiable risk factor for surgical site infection[J]. Surg Infect (Larchmt), 2016, 17(6): 755-760.

37. Albertini P, Mainardi P, Bagattini M, et al. Risk influence of some environmental and behavioral factors on air contamination in the operating room: an experimental study[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2023, 20(16): 6592.

38. Pokrywka M, Byers K. Traffic in the operating room: a review of factors influencing air flow and surgical wound contamination[J]. Infect Disord Drug Targets, 2013, 13(3): 156-161.

Popular Papers