Welcome to visit Zhongnan Medical Journal Press Series journal website!

Analysis of the influencing factors of delivery timing and mode of preterm maternal in a maternity and child care hospital in Beijing

Published on Aug. 31, 2024Total Views: 1308 timesTotal Downloads: 374 timesDownloadMobile

Author: YUAN Li 1 REN Hong 2 CHEN Xiaojin 2 WANG Huiyu 1

Affiliation: 1. Physical Examination Center, Beijing Haidian District Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Beijing 100080, China 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beijing Chaoyang District Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Beijing 100026, China

Keywords: Premature delivery Delivery timing Delivery mode Influencing factors Outcome

DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1004-5511.202404001

Reference: Yuan L, Ren H, Chen XJ, Wang HY. Analysis of the influencing factors of delivery timing and mode of preterm maternal in a maternity and child care hospital in Beijing[J]. Yixue Xinzhi Zazhi, 2024, 34(8): 880-887. DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1004-5511.202404001. [Article in Chinese]

  • Abstract
  • Full-text
  • References
Abstract

Objective  To investigate the influencing factors of delivery timing and delivery mode of preterm maternal in a maternity and child care hospital in Beijing.

Methods  The general clinical data of preterm maternal in the hospital from January 2017 to December 2019 were analyzed retrospectively and divided into the early and mid-preterm group and late preterm group according to the delivery weeks. And were also divided into the natural birth group and cesarean section group according to the delivery mode. Multi-factor Logistic regression was used to analyze the influence factors of delivery timing and delivery mode of maternal in different groups.

Results  639 pregnant women (5.42%) had preterm birth, of which 132 cases (20.66%) had early and mid-preterm birth and 507 cases (79.34%) had late preterm birth. 328 cases (51.33%) were delivered by cesarean section and 311 cases (48.67%) were delivered naturally. Age, adverse birth history, scar uterus, folic acid administration during pregnancy and complications of pregnancy were the independent factors of early and mid-preterm. Age, BMI, multiple births, scar uterus and complications of pregnancy were independent factors of cesarean section selection during premature delivery. The 1 min and 10 min Apgar scores of early and mid-preterm infants were significantly lower than those of late preterm infants, and the mortality within 1 year was significantly higher than that of the late preterm infants (P<0.05).

Conclusion  The delivery timing and delivery mode of maternal were mainly affected by age, adverse birth history, scar uterus and pregnancy complications, The delivery timing directly affected the outcome of preterm infants.

Full-text
Please download the PDF version to read the full text: download
References

1.张小松, 杨慧霞. 早产发生的影响因素及其流行病学研究进展[J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2017, 52(5): 344-347. [Zhang XS, Yang HX. Research progress on risk factors and epidemiology of preterm birth[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology , 2017, 52(5): 344-347.] DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567x.2017.05.013.

2.Vogel JP, Chawanpaiboon S, Moller AB, et al. The global epidemiology of preterm birth[J]. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 2018, 52:3-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2018.04.003.

3.尹玲凤, 丁虹娟. 早产相关因素的研究进展[J]. 中国妇幼健康研究, 2016, 27(6): 781-783. [Yin LF, Ding HJ. Research process in correlative factors of preterm birth[J]. Chinese Practical Journal of Rural Doctor, 2016, 27(6): 781-783.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5293.2016.06.038.

4.虢海月, 杜姣洋, 李敏敏, 等. 西安市早产儿发生状况及其影响因素分析[J]. 西安交通大学学报(医学版), 2020, 41(2): 281-286. [Guo HY, Du JY, Li MM, et al. The occurrence of premature delivery in Xi'an and its influencing factors[J]. Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University (Medical Sciences), 2020, 41(2): 281-286.] DOI: 10.7652/jdyxb202002024.

5.谢幸, 孔北华,段涛. 妇产科学[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2018. [Xie  X, Kong BH, Duan T. Obstetrics and gynecology[M]. Beijing: People's Medical Publishing House, 2018.]

6.刘平, 樊尚荣. “Apgar评分共识(2015)”解读[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2015, 4(4): 214-218. [Liu P, Fan  SR. Interpretation of “Apgar score consensus (2015)”[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetric Emergency (Electronic Edition), 2015, 4(4): 214-218.] DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095- 3259.2015.04.005.

7.Kogoleva LV, Katargina LA, Sudovskaya TV, et al. Results of long-term observation of extremely premature babies with retinopathy[J]. Vestn Oftalmol, 2020, 136(5): 39-45. DOI: 10.17116/oftalma202013605139.

8.Mcgowan EC, Vohr BR. Neurodevelopmental follow-up of preterm infants: what is new?[J]. Pediatr Clin North Am, 2019, 66(2): 509-523. DOI: 10.1016/j.pcl.2018.12.015.

9.Deng K, Liang J, Mu Y, et al. Preterm births in China between 2012 and 2018: an observational study of more than 9 million women[J]. Lancet Glob Health, 2021, 9(9): e1226-e1241. DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00298-9.

10.胡敏,张玉,刘柳,等. 2012—2021年柳州市早产发生率变化趋势及影响因素分析[J]. 现代预防医学, 2023, 50(17): 3139-3144. [Hu M, Zhang Y, Liu L, et al. Analysis on the changing trend and influencing factors of preterm delivery in Liuzhou city from 2012 to 2021[J]. Modern Preventive Medicine, 2023, 50(17): 3139-3144] DOI: 10.20043/j.cnki.MPM.202302099.

11.Hang YJ, Shen J, Lin SB, et al. The risk factors of preterm birth: a multicentre case-control survey in China in 2018[J]. J Paediatr Child Health, 2022, 58(8): 1396-1406. DOI: 10.1111/jpc.16002.

12.Becker M, Mayo JA, Phogat NK, et al. Deleterious and protective psychosocial and stress-related factors predict risk of spontaneous preterm birth[J]. Am J Perinatol, 2023, 40(1): 74-88. DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1729162.

13.Jiang M, Mishu MM, Lu D, et al. A case control study of risk factors and neonatal outcomes of preterm birth[J]. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol, 2018, 57(6): 814-818. DOI: 10.1016/j.tjog.2018.10.008.

14.叶圣, 汤艳婷, 魏春晖. 早产儿1192例早产原因及并发症分析[J]. 中外医学研究, 2017, 15(3): 95-96. [Ye S, Tang YT, Wei CH. Analysis of the causes and complications of 1192 cases of premature infants[J]. Chinese and Foreign Medical Research, 2017, 15(3): 95-96.] DOI: CNKI:SUN:YJZY.0.2017-03-052.

15.尕项卓玛, 简勤勤, 秦风雪. 青海地区妇女早产的相关因素及母婴结局分析[J]. 重庆医学, 2017, 46(34): 4843-4845. [Ga XZM, Jian QQ, Qin FX. To analyze the related factors and maternal and infant outcomes of preterm birth in Qinghai province[J]. Chongqing Medicine, 2017, 46(34): 4843-4845.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-8348.2017.34.031.

16.孔琳, 陈昭霞, 覃钰芹, 等. 2017—2019年广西壮族自治区早产发生率及相关因素分析[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2020, 100(42): 3338-3341. [Kong L, Chen ZX, Qin  YQ, et al. Occurrence and related factors of preterm birth in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region during 2017—2019[J]. National Medical Journal of China, 2020, 100(42): 3338-3341.] DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20200804-02276.

17.姜宁宁, 钟利君. 孕妇发生极早早产和早期早产的高危因素分析[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2021, 36(4): 792-795. [Jiang NN, Zhong LJ. Analysis of risk factors for very early birth and early preterm birth[J]. Maternal & Child Health Care of China, 2021, 36(4): 792-795.] DOI: 10.19829/j.zgfybj.issn.1001-4411.2021.04.020.

18.李美英, 罗小金, 何武奇, 等. 双胎妊娠早产风险预测的列线图模型构建[J]. 中国优生与遗传杂志, 2021, 29(3): 350-354. [Li MY, Luo XJ, He WQ, et al. Incidence of premature birth in twin pregnancy and the establishment of nomogram model for risk prediction[J]. Chinese Journal of Birth Health & Heredity, 2021, 29(3): 350-354.] https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZYYA202103014.htm.

19.刘小晖, 刘小玲, 董燕, 等. 围孕期叶酸摄入与早产不同亚型的相关性研究[J].中国妇幼健康研究, 2020, 31(5): 553-559. [Liu XH, Liu XL, Dong Y, et al. Study on correlation between folic acid supplementation during perigestational period and different subtypes of preterm birth[J].Chinese Journal of Woman and Child Health Research, 2020, 31(5): 553-559.] DOI: CNKI:SUN:SANE. 0.2020-05-004.

20.邱小菊, 苏小锋, 周冬梅, 等. 早产高危风险因素分析及Nomogram预测模型构建[J]. 中国计划生育和妇产科, 2023, 15(3): 78-81, 113. [Qiu XJ, Su XF, Zhou DM, et al. Analysis of high risk factors of premature birth and Nomogram predictionmodel construction[J]. Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology, 2023, 15(3): 78-81, 113.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-4020. 2023.03.18.

21.闫俊梅, 黄辉, 李倩倩, 等. 2006~2016年11年间早产儿发生率及病死率的单中心研究[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志, 2018, 20(5): 368-372. [Yan JM, Huang H, Li QQ, et al. A single-center study on the incidence and mortality of preterm infants from 2006 to 2016[J]. Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics, 2018, 20(5): 368-372.] DOI: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2018.05.006.

22.中国医师协会新生儿科医师分会循证专业委员会. 早产儿和低出生体重儿袋鼠式护理临床实践指南(2022)[J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2023, 23(3): 249-264. [Evidence-Based Medicine Group,Neonatologist Society,Chinese Medical Doctor Association. Clinical practice guidelines for kangaroo mother care in preterm and low birth weight infants (2022)[J]. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2023, 23(3): 249-264.] DOI: 10.7507/1672-2531.202209145.

23.张沂洁, 朱燕, 陈超. 早产儿发生率及变化趋势[J]. 中华新生儿科杂志, 2021, 36(4): 74-77. [Zhang YJ, Zhu Y, Chen C. Incidence and trends of preterm infants[J]. Chinese Journal of Neonatology , 2021, 36(4): 74-77.] DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2096-2932.2021.04.021.