Welcome to visit Zhongnan Medical Journal Press Series journal website!

Reliability and validity test of Urinary Catheter Removal Assessment Scale for Patients with Colorectal Surgery

Published on Jun. 29, 2024Total Views: 993 timesTotal Downloads: 384 timesDownloadMobile

Author: YIN Yan 1 ZHANG Chunhua 2 HE Wenbin 3 DUAN Jing 3 LI Sisi 3 XIE Xiaoyu 3 LUO Man 3 SUN Wen 3 WU Ling 3

Affiliation: 1. Wound/Stoma Diagnosis and Treatment Center, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430071, China 2. Nursing Department, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430071, China 3. Department of Colorectal & Anal Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430071, China

Keywords: Colorectal Enhanced recovery after surgery Urinary catheter removal Scale Reliability Validity

DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1004-5511.202402070

Reference: Yin Y, Zhang CH, He WB, Duan J, Li SS, Xie XY, Luo M, Sun W, Wu L. Reliability and validity test of Urinary Catheter Removal Assessment Scale for Patients with Colorectal Surgery[J]. Yixue Xinzhi Zazhi, 2024, 34(6): 665-674. DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1004-5511.202402070.[Article in Chinese]

  • Abstract
  • Full-text
  • References
Abstract

Objective  To construct the Urinary Catheter Removal Assessment Scale for Patients with Colorectal Surgery under the guidance of the concept of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS), and to test reliability and validity.

Methods  Under the guidance of the concept of ERAS, the relevant factors affecting the timing of urinary catheter removal in patients with colorectal surgery were analyzed through literature review and expert interview, and combined with clinical practice. The initial scale was formed through 2 rounds of Delphi consultations. A total of 137 patients undergoing colorectal surgery in a grade-III hospital in Hubei province from April to October 2023 were selected by convenience sampling method for questionnaire survey, and the reliability and validity test was conducted to analyze the sensitivity and specificity of the scale and determine the optimal threshold.

Results  The scale consists of 3 dimensions and 20 items. The cumulative variance contribution rate was 83.582%. The content validity index was 0.96~1.00 at the item level and 0.91 at the scale level. The correlation coefficient between each item and its dimension ranged from 0.637 to 0.852, between the dimensions ranged from 0.602 to 0.774, and between each dimension and the total table ranged from 0.889 to 0.918. The Cronbach’s α coefficient of each dimension was 0.914~0.957, and of the total scale was 0.931. The partial half-reliability of each dimension was 0.913~0.942, and of the scale was 0.958. The area under the ROC curve of the scale was 0.934[95CI%(0.892, 0.975)]. When the scale score was 29.5, the sensitivity, specificity and Yoden index of the scale were the highest, which were 0.870, 0.912 and 0.782, respectively. When the score is less than 29.5, the urinary catheter could be removed.

Conclusion  The catheter removal tool constructed in this study has good reliability and validity, and could accurately judge the timing of catheter removal in patients with colorectal surgery through clinical verification.

Full-text
Please download the PDF version to read the full text: download
References

1.Mclntosh S, Hunter R, Scrimgeour D, et al. Timing of urinary catheter removal after colorectal surgery with pelvic dissection: a systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. Ann Med Surg (Lond), 2021, 73: 103148. DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu. 2021.103148.

2.Serra-Aracil X, DomÍnguez A, Mora-LÓpez L, et al. Urinary catheter in colorectal surgery: current practices and improvements in order to allow prompt removal. A cross-sectional study[J]. Minerva Surg, 2021, 76(1): 72-79. DOI: 10.23736/S2724-5691.20.08341-8.

3.Roulet M, Delbarre B, Vénara A, et al. Urine drainage management in colorectal surgery[J]. J Visc Surg, 2020, 157(4): 309-316. DOI: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2020.05.002.

4.Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Hubner M, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colorectal surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) society recommendations: 2018[J]. World J Surg, 2019, 43(3): 659-695. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-018-4844-y.

5.曹晖,陈亚进,顾小萍,等. 中国加速康复外科临床实践指南(2021版)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2021, 41(9): 961-992. [Cao H, Chen YJ, Gu XP, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for enhanced recovery after surgery in China (2021 edition)[J]. Chinese Journal of Practical Surgery, 2021, 41(9): 961-992.] DOI: 10.19538/j.cjps.issn1005-2208.2021.09.01.

6.Ghuman A, Kasteel N, Karimuddin AA, et al. Urinary retention in early urinary catheter removal after colorectal surgery[J]. Am J Surg, 2018, 215(5): 949-952. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.01.032.

7.邹鹤娟,李光辉. 成人导管相关尿路感染的诊断、预防和治疗—2009年美国感染病学会国际临床实践指南[J]. 中国感染与化疗杂志, 2010, 10(5): 321-324. [Zou HJ, Li GH. Diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of catheter-associated urinary tract infection in adults: 2009 international clinical practice guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Society of America[J]. Chinese Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy, 2010, 10(5): 321-324.] DOI: 10.16718/j.1009-7708.2010.05.016.

8.中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会. 导尿管相关尿路感染预防与控制技术指南(试行). [EB/OL].(2010-12-14)[2022-12-31].https://www.gov.cn/gzdt/2010-12/14/content_1765450.htm

9.吴明隆. 结构方程模型—AMOS的操作与应用(第二版)[M]. 重庆:重庆大学出版社, 2013. [Wu ML. Structural equation modeling: AMOS operations and applications(2nd Edition)[M]. Chongqing: Chongqing University Press, 2013.]

10.李太顺, 刘沛. ROC曲线绘制和曲线下面积比较的SAS宏包[J]. 中国卫生统计, 2018, 35(2): 302-304, 309. [Li  TS, Liu P. SAS macro package for ROC curve drawing and area under curve comparison[J]. Chinese Journal of Health Statistics, 2018, 35(2): 302-304, 309.] DOI: CNKI:SUN: ZGWT.0.2018-02-040.

11.Zhang Z, Wan Z, Zhu Y, et al. Predictive validity of the GLIM criteria in treatment outcomes in cancer patients with radiotherapy[J]. Clin Nutr, 2022, 41(4): 855-861. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2022.02.011.

12.田彦,王艳伶,邵广宇,等. 2型糖尿病患者自我护理保护动机量表的编制与信度效度检验[J]. 中国护理管理, 2022, 22(9): 1347-1352. [Tian Y, Wang YL, Shao GY, et al. Development and validity of the Self-Care Protection Motivation Scale for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus[J]. Chinese Nursing Management, 2022, 22(9): 1347-1352.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2022.09.016.

13.Mattevi C, van Coppenolle C, Selvy M, et al. Systematic review and Meta-analysis of early removal of urinary catheter after colorectal surgery with infraperitoneal anastomosis[J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2022, 407(1): 15-23. DOI: 10.1007/s00423-021-02342-2.

14.Lee Y, McKechnie T, Springer JE, et al. Optimal timing of urinary catheter removal following pelvic colorectal surgery: a systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2019, 34(12): 2011-2021. DOI: 10.1007/s00384-019-03404-0.

15.栗霞,赵泽英,柯秀柳,等. 基于德尔菲法构建泌尿外科护理安全管理评价体系[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(1): 72-77. [Li X, Zhao ZY, Ke XL, et al. Construction of evaluation system for urological nursing safety management based on Delphi method[J]. Chinese Journal of Endourology (Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(1): 72-77.] DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2023.01.016.

16.Batchelor TJP, Rasburn NJ, Abdelnour-Berchtold E, et al. Guidelines for enhanced recovery after lung surgery: recommendations of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS)[J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2019, 55(1): 91-115. DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy301.

17.Patel DN, Felder SI, Luu M, et al. Early urinary catheter removal following pelvic colorectal surgery: a prospective, randomized, noninferiority trial[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2018, 61(10): 1180-1186. DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001206.

18.王微,杜相珠,马悦,等. 改良留置导尿管相关尿路感染病原菌及感染危险因素研究[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(1): 78-81. [Wang W, Du  XZ, Ma  Y, et al. Study of the pathogenic bacteria and risk factors for patients with modified indwelling catheter-associated urinary tract infection[J]. Chinese Journal of Endourology (Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(1): 78-81.] DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2023.01.017.

19.宋美璇,李显蓉. 早期拔除尿管对结直肠手术患者泌尿系统并发症影响的Meta分析[J]. 护理学杂志, 2016, 31(18): 101-105. [Song MX, Li XR. Influences of early removal of urinary catheter in patients after colorectal surgery on complications of the urinary system: a Meta-analysis[J]. Journal of Nursing Science, 2016, 31(18): 101-105.] DOI: 10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2016.18.101.