Welcome to visit Zhongnan Medical Journal Press Series journal website!

Analysis of situation and risk factors of multiple drug resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia in intensive care unit

Published on Jun. 29, 2024Total Views: 1075 timesTotal Downloads: 446 timesDownloadMobile

Author: HE Miaobo LAI Pengshu DAI Luting ZHANG Lijiao HUANG Yuqin HUANG Qiang XU Huaqiang ZHOU Quan

Affiliation: Department of Intensive Care Unit, Suizhou Hospital Affiliated to Hubei University of Medicine/Suizhou Central Hospital, Suizhou 441399, Hubei Province, China

Keywords: Intensive care unit Mechanical ventilation Multiple drug resistance Pseudomonas aeruginosa Ventilator-associated pneumonia Risk factor

DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1004-5511.202401033

Reference: He MB, Lai PS, Dai LT, Zhang LJ, Huang YQ, Huang Q, Xu HQ, Zhou Q. Analysis of situation and risk factors of multiple drug resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia in intensive care unit[J]. Yixue Xinzhi Zazhi, 2024, 34(6): 630-638. DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1004-5511.202401033.[Article in Chinese]

  • Abstract
  • Full-text
  • References
Abstract

Objective  To analyze the drug resistance situation and risk factors of multi-drug resistant in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA-VAP) in intensive care unit (ICU) undergoing mechanical ventilation.

Methods  The clinical data of PA-VAP patients in ICU in Suizhou Central Hospital from March 2018 to March 2023 were collected retrospectively. PA-VAP patients were divided into sensitive group and drug resistance group according to whether they were infected with multi-drug resistant PA. The drug resistance characteristics between the two groups were analyzed and the risk factors were analyzed using Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Results  A total of 130 patients with PA-VAP were included. There were 65 patients each in the sensitive group and drug-resistant group. PA-VAP patients had high resistance rate to imipenem (60.0%), levofloxacin (50.8%), ciprofloxacin (50.8%), and ceftazidime (50.8%), but low resistance to polymyxin (7.7%) and amikacin (16.9%). Logistic regression analysis showed that tracheostomy [OR=6.045, 95% CI (2.416, 15.125)], ≥3 types of antibiotics [OR=2.704, 95% CI (1.062, 6.881)], and use of carbapenem antibiotics [OR=4.283, 95% CI (1.642, 11.173)] were independent risk factors for the multiple drug resistance in PA-VAP patients (P<0.05). The area under the ROC curve for the combined application of the above three factors was 0.824[95% CI(0.752, 0.896)], with a sensitivity of 0.785 and a specificity of 0.738.

Conclusion  ICU mechanically ventilated patients with PA-VAP have a high rate of antibiotic resistance. Tracheostomy, the use of ≥3 types of antibiotics, and the use of carbapenems increase the risk of multiple drug resistance. Targeted measures need to be taken for the prevention and treatment of multiple drug resistance PA-VAP patients in clinical practice.

Full-text
Please download the PDF version to read the full text: download
References

1.中华医学会呼吸病学分会感染学组. 中国成人医院获得性肺炎与呼吸机相关性肺炎诊断和治疗指南(2018年版)[J]. 中华结核和呼吸杂志, 2018, 41(4): 255-280. [Infection Group, Chinese Thoracic Society. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia and ventilator-associated pneumonia in China (2018 edition)[J]. Chinese Journal of Tuberculosis and Respiratory, 2018, 41(4): 255-280.] DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-0939.2018.04.006.

2.Papazian L, Klompas M, Luyt CE. Ventilator-associated pneumonia in adults: a narrative review[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2020, 46(5): 888-906. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-020-05980-0.

3.Faure E, Kwong K, Nguyen D. Pseudomonas aeruginosa in chronic lung infections: how to adapt within the host?[J]. Front Immunol, 2018, 9: 2416. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02416.

4.胡付品, 郭燕, 朱德妹, 等. 2021年CHINET中国细菌耐药监测[J]. 中国感染与化疗杂志, 2022, 22(5): 521-530. [Hu FP, Guo Y, Zhu DM, et al. Surveillance of bacterial drug resistance in CHINET China in 2021[J]. Chinese Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy, 2022, 22(5): 521-530.] DOI: 10.16718/j.1009-7708.2022. 05.001.

5.陈海涛,管金梅. 铜绿假单胞菌致呼吸机相关性肺炎的危险因素及耐药性研究[J]. 中国现代医药杂志, 2019, 21(4): 11-15. [Chen HT, Guan JM. Study on risk factors and drug resistance of ventilator-associated pneumonia caused by pseudomonas aeruginosa[J]. Modern Medicine Journal of China, 2019, 21(4): 11-15.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9463.2019.04.003.

6.中华医学会呼吸病学分会感染学组. 中国铜绿假单胞菌下呼吸道感染诊治专家共识(2022年版)[J]. 中华结核和呼吸杂志, 2022, 45(8): 739-752. [Infection Group, Chinese Thoracic Society. Chinese expert consensus on the management of lower repiratory tract infections of pseudomonas aeruginosa in adults(2022)[J]. Chinese Journal of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Disease, 2022, 45(8): 739-752.] DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112147-20220407-00290.

7.Humphries R, Bobenchik AM, Hindler JA, et al. Overview of changes to the clinical and laboratory standards institute performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, M100, 31st edition[J]. J Clin Microbiol, 2021, 59(12): e0021321. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00213-21.

8.肖蕊, 马丰丽, 刘景云. 颅脑损伤开颅术后患者肺部感染的相关因素研究[J]. 医药论坛杂志, 2024, 45(7): 749-752. [Xiao R, Ma FL, Liu JY. Study on related factors of pulmonary infection in patients with craniocerebral injury after craniotomy[J]. Journal of Medical Forum, 2024, 45(7): 749-752.] DOI: 10.20159/j.cnki.jmf.2024.07.016.

9.王冠超, 张永涛. APACHE Ⅱ评分结合血清PCT、hs-CRP对重症肺炎合并呼吸衰竭的预测价值研究[J].现代医药卫生, 2024, 40(8): 1307-1311, 1316. [Wang GC, Zhang YT. The predictive value of APACHE Ⅱ score combined with serum PCT and hs-CRP in severe pneumonia complicated with respiratory failure[J]. Journal of Modern Medicine & Health, 2024,40(8):1307-1311, 1316.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-5519.2024.08.011.

10.侯会娜, 刘文先, 夏燕敏. 营养风险筛查2002评分和血清白蛋白水平对慢性阻塞性肺疾病合并呼吸衰竭患者预后的评估价值[J]. 安徽医学, 2021, 42(11): 1276-1280. [Hou HN, Liu WX, Xia YM. The prognostic value of nutritional risk screening 2002 score and serum albumin level in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease complicated with respiratory failure[J]. Anhui Medical Journal, 2021, 42(11): 1276-1280.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0399.2021.11.017.

11.段巧艳, 余美芬. 痰培养标本采集处理方法改进对细菌学检验质量的效果影响[J]. 智慧健康, 2023, 9(13): 5-9. [Duan QY, Yu MF. Effect of improved collection and treatment of sputum culture samples on the quality of bacteriological examination[J]. Smart Healthcare, 2023, 9(13): 5-9.] DOI: 10.19335/j.cnki.2096- 1219.2023. 13.002.

12.Chang Y, Jeon K, Lee SM, et al. The distribution of multidrug-resistant microorganisms and treatment status of hospital-acquired pneumonia/ventilator-associated pneumonia in adult intensive care units: a prospective cohort observational study[J]. J Korean Med Sci, 2021, 36(41): e251. DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e251.

13.Hernández-Jiménez P, López-Medrano F, Fernández-Ruiz M, et al. Risk factors and outcomes for multidrug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in immunocompromised patients[J]. Antibiotics (Basel), 2022, 11(11): 1459. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics11111459.

14.Harris AD, Jackson SS, Robinson G, et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa colonization in the intensive care unit: prevalence, risk factors, and clinical outcomes[J]. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol, 2016, 37(5): 544-548. DOI: 10.1017/ice.2015.346.

15.Souza GHA, Rossato L, Brito GT, et al. Carbapenem-resistant pseudomonas aeruginosa strains: a worrying health problem in intensive care units[J]. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo, 2021, 63: e71. DOI: 10.1590/S1678-9946202163071.

16.Park SA, Cho SS, Kwak GJ. Factors influencing ventilator-associated pneumonia in cancer patients[J]. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 2014, 15(14): 5787-5791. DOI: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.14.5787.

17.Miyoshi-Akiyama T, Tada T, Ohmagari N, et al. Emergence and spread of epidemic multidrug-resistant pseudomonas aeruginosa[J]. Genome Biol Evol, 2017, 9(12): 3238-3245. DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evx243.

18.Kula BE, Hudson D, Sligl WI. Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in intensive care: epidemiology, outcomes, and antimicrobial susceptibilities[J]. J Assoc Med Microbiol Infect Dis Can, 2020, 5(3): 130-138. DOI: 10.3138/jammi-2020-0003.

19.Hu Y, Qing Y, Chen J, et al. Prevalence, risk factors, and molecular epidemiology of intestinal carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa[J]. Microbiol Spectr, 2021, 9(3): e0134421. DOI: 10.1128/Spectrum.01344-21.

20.Tamma PD, Aitken SL, Bonomo RA, et al. Infectious diseases society of America 2022 guidance on the treatment of extended-spectrum β-lactamase producing enterobacterales (ESBL-E), carbapenem-resistant enterobacterales (CRE), and pseudomonas aeruginosa with difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR-P. aeruginosa)[J]. Clin Infect Dis, 2022, 75(2): 187-212. DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciac268.

21.Oliver A, Mulet X, López-Causapé C, et al. The increasing threat of pseudomonas aeruginosa high-risk clones[J]. Drug Resist Updat, 2015, 21-22: 41-59. DOI: 10.1016/j.drup.2015.08.002.

22.郭咸希, 何文, 陈莹, 等. 临床药师参与多重耐药菌感染重症肺炎的治疗及药学监护[J]. 中国药师, 2022, 25(4): 676-681. [Guo XX, He W, Chen Y, et al. Clinical pharmacists participate in the treatment and pharmaceutical care of severe pneumonia caused by multiple drug-resistant bacteria[J]. China Pharmacist, 2022, 25(4): 676-681.] DOI: 10.19962/j.cnki.issn1008-049X.2022.04.021.