Preclinical animal experiment is an important bridge connecting basic medicine and clinic, and the necessity of animal experiment registration is becoming more and more apparent. This paper introduces the international animal experiment registration platform, registration content and process, and compares and analyzes it, aiming to popularize the knowledge of animal experiment registration, improve the awareness of researchers, and provide reference for domestic researchers to register animal experiments.
HomeArticlesVol 34,2024 No.1Detail
Brief introduction of animal experiment registration platform
Published on Jan. 31, 2024Total Views: 3089 timesTotal Downloads: 1138 timesDownloadMobile
- Abstract
- Full-text
- References
Abstract
Full-text
References
1.Lichtenegger A, Mukherjee P, Tamaoki J, et al. Multicontrast investigation of in vivo wildtype zebrafish in three development stages using polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography[J]. J Biomed Opt, 2022, 27(1):016001. DOI: 10.1117/1.Jbo.27.1.016001.
2.Ritskes-Hoitinga M, van Luijk J. How can systematic reviews teach us more about the implementation of the 3Rs and animal welfare?[J]. Animals (Basel), 2019, 9(12):1163. DOI: 10.3390/ani9121163.
3.Zhao S, Wang D, Zhao H, et al. Time to raise the bar: transition rate of phase 1 programs on anticancer drugs[J]. Cancer Cell, 2022, 40(3): 233-235. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2022.01.007.
4.Haslam A, Olivier T, Powell K, et al. Eventual success rate and predictors of success for oncology drugs tested in phase I trials[J]. Int J Cancer, 2023, 152(2): 276-282. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34181.
5.Merkow JS, Hoerauf JM, Moss AF, et al. Animal experimental research design in critical care[J]. BMC Med Res Methodol, 2018, 18(1): 71. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-018-0526-6.
6.Kaur H, Sarma P, Kaur M, et al. Current status of in silico, preclinical and clinical study registries across the globe: a systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. Indian J Pharmacol, 2021, 53(2): 160-169. DOI: 10.4103/ijp.ijp_1090_20.
7.Muhlhausler BS, Bloomfield FH, Gillman MW. Whole animal experiments should be more like human randomized controlled trials[J]. PLoS Biol, 2013, 11(2): e1001481.DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001481.
8.Kiwanuka O, Bellander BM, Hånell A. The case for introducing pre-registered confirmatory pharmacological pre-clinical studies [J]. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab, 2018, 38(5): 749-754. DOI: 10.1177/0271678x18760109.
9.Wieschowski S, Silva DS, Strech D. Animal study registries: results from a stakeholder analysis on potential strengths, weaknesses, facilitators, and barriers[J]. PLoS Biol, 2016, 14(11): e2000391. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2000391.
10.Diederich K, Schmitt K, Schwedhelm P, et al. A guide to open science practices for animal research[J]. PLoS Biol, 2022, 20(9): e3001810. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001810.
11.Kimmelman J, Anderson JA. Should preclinical studies be registered?[J]. Nat Biotechnol, 2012, 30(6): 488-489. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.2261.
12.van der Naald M, Chamuleau SAJ, Menon JML, et al. A 3-year evaluation of preclinicaltrials.eu reveals room for improvement in preregistration of animal studies[J]. PLoS Biol, 2021, 19(9): e3001397. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001397.
13.Bert B, Heinl C, Chmielewska J, et al. Refining animal research: the animal study registry[J]. PLoS Biol, 2019, 17(10): e3000463. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000463.
14.DeRisi S, Kennison R, Twyman N. The what and whys of DOIs[J]. PLoS Biol, 2003, 1(2): E57. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0000057.
15.Kilkenny C, Browne WJ, Cuthill IC, et al. Improving bioscience research reporting: the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research[J]. PLOS Biology, 2010, 8(6): e1000412. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000412.
16.Hooijmans CR, Ritskes-Hoitinga M. Progress in using systematic reviews of animal studies to improve translational research[J]. PLoS Med, 2013, 10(7): e1001482. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001482.
17.Freedman LP, Cockburn IM, Simcoe TS. The economics of reproducibility in preclinical research[J]. PLoS Biol, 2015, 13(6): e1002165. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002165.
18.Mierden S, Hooijmans CR, Tillema AH. Laboratory animals search filter for different literature databases: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and PsycINFO[J]. Lab Anim, 2022, 56(3): 279-86. DOI: 10.1177/ 00236772211045485.
19.NIH. Number of registrations, Clinicaltrials.gov [EB/OL].(2023-6-30) [2023-10-27]. clinicaltrials.gov.
20.ChiCTR. Number of registrations [EB/OL]. (2023-06-30) [2023-10-27]. https://www.chictr.org.cn/index.html.
Popular Papers
-
Analysis of the effect of dietary factors on irritable bowel syndrome by Mendelian randomized method
Apr. 25, 20254670
-
Analysis of spatial distribution characteristics and influencing factors of depression among elderly people in China
Mar. 25, 20253100
-
Advances in the study of the effects of circadian rhythm disruption on male infertility
Mar. 25, 20252986
-
Constructing a predictive model for mild cognitive impairment in elderly individuals with coexisting multiple diseases based on machine learning algorithms
Apr. 25, 20252758
-
Clinical progress of cadonilimab in the treatment of malignant tumor
Jun. 25, 20252663
-
The role of neutrophil extracellular traps in ulcerative colitis
Mar. 25, 20252663
-
Development and future prospect of project-based learning in medical education from interdisciplinary perspective: taking the teaching practice of Sichuan University as an example
Apr. 25, 20252634
-
The current status and associated factors of interprofessional cooperative learning of graduate students in traditional Chinese medicine colleges
Mar. 25, 20252504