Welcome to visit Zhongnan Medical Journal Press Series journal website!
Zhongnan Medical Journal Press Series of Journals Center for Evidence-Based and Translational Medicine of Wuhan University

The title
  • The title
  • The keywords
  • The author
Submit中文版

HomeArticlesVol 34,2024 No.11Detail

Sinicization and reliability and validity testing of the Casey-Fink Readiness for Practice Scale for nursing students

Published on Dec. 18, 2024Total Views: 46 timesTotal Downloads: 15 timesDownloadMobile

Author: SONG Jiali 1 HE Huijuan 1, 2 WANG Xiangrong 1, 2 CHEN Yiwen 3 LI Mengying 1, 2 ZHANG Yuan 4 ZHOU Siyu 1

Affiliation: 1. School of Nursing, Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, Wuhan 430065, China 2. Hubei Shizhen Laboratory, Wuhan 430065, China 3. Department of Nursing, Wuhan Fourth Hospital, Wuhan 430033, China 4. Department of Nursing, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430071, China

Keywords: Nursing students Casey-Fink Readiness for Practice Scale Scale translation Reliability Validity

DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1004-5511.202409003

Reference: Song JL, He HJ, Wang XR, Chen YW, Li MY, Zhang Y, Zhou SY. Sinicization and reliability and validity testing of the Casey-Fink Readiness for Practice Scale for nursing students[J]. Yixue Xinzhi Zazhi, 2024, 34(11): 1311-1318. DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1004-5511.202409003. [Article in Chinese]

  • Abstract
  • Full-text
  • References
Abstract

Objective  To translate the Casey-Fink Readiness for Practice Scale (CFRPS) into Chinese version and to test its reliability and validity.

Methods  According to the Brislin translation model, translation, back-translation, cross-cultural adaptation and pilot testing were performed to produce the Chinese version of the CFRPS. The reliability of the scale was evaluated by facilitating the survey of senior nursing students from 8 universities in 5 provinces.

Results  The Chinese version of CFRPS included 4 dimensions (clinical problem-solving, testing and honing, professional identity, and learning skills) and 19 items. Four common factors were extracted by exploratory factor analysis, with a cumulative variance contribution rate of 76.618%. The fitting indices of confirmatory factor analysis were all within an acceptable range (χ2/df=1.468, RMSEA=0.046, GFI=0.905, IFI=0.968, TLI=0.962, and CFI=0.967). The Cronbach's α of the scale was 0.893. The split-half reliability was 0.782, and retest reliability was 0.883.

Conclusion  The Chinese version of the CFRPS has good reliability and validity, and it can be used as a tool to measure senior nursing students' readiness for clinical practice.

Full-text
Please download the PDF version to read the full text: download
References

1. Bijani M, Mohammadi F, Haghani F, et al. Development and psychometric evaluation of a reflection on clinical practice questionnaire for nursing students[J]. BMC Nurs, 2021, 20(1): 185. DOI: 10.1186/s12912-021-00705-0.

2. 张建伟,谢仙萍,张晓红,等. 护理实习生教学管理软件的研发及应用[J]. 护理研究, 2020, 34(7): 1242-1245. [Zhang JW, Xie XP, Zhang XH, et al. Development and application of teaching management software for nursing interns[J]. Chinese Nursing Research, 2020, 34(7): 1242-1245.] DOI: 10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2020.07.028.

3. Mirza N, Manankil-Rankin L, Prentice D, et al. Practice readiness of new nursing graduates: a concept analysis[J]. Nurse Educ Pract, 2019, 37: 68-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.nepr. 2019.04.009.

4. Kroger J, Marcia JE. Handbook of identity theory and research[M]. New York: Springer New York, 2011.

5. 张许婷,罗彩凤,魏兰芝,等. 实习护生体面劳动感的潜在剖面分析及影响因素研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(3): 12-16. [Zhang XT, Luo CF, Wei LZ, et al. Latent profile analysis of decent work among nursing interns and its influencing factors[J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(3): 12-16.] DOI: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2024.03.012.

6. 陈链,李杨,黄冬,等. 护理实习生共情疲乏的变化趋势及影响因素研究[J]. 护士进修杂志, 2024, 39(3): 230-235. [Chen L, Li Y, Huang D, et al. Study on the changing trend and influencing factors of empathy fatigue in nursing interns[J]. Journal of Nurses Training, 2024, 39(3): 230-235.] DOI: 10.16821/j.cnki.hsjx. 2024.03.002.

7. Casey K, Fink R, Jaynes C, et al. Readiness for practice: the senior practicum experience[J]. J Nurs Educ, 2011, 50(11): 646-652. DOI: 10.3928/01484834-20110817-03.

8. Lee H, Min H, Kim C, et al. Psychometric evaluation of the Korean version of the work readiness scale for graduating nursing students[J]. Collegian, 2021, 28(1): 128-134. DOI: 10.1016/j.colegn.2020.03.002.

9. Kuleyin B, Basaran-Acil S. The Turkish version of the Casey-Fink Readiness for practice scale: a validity and reliability study[J]. Nurse Educ Pract, 2023, 70: 103667. DOI: 10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103667.

10. 王晓娇,夏海鸥. 基于Brislin经典回译模型的新型翻译模型的构建及应用[J]. 护理学杂志, 2016, 31(7): 61-63. [Wang XJ, Xia HO. Construction and application of a new translation model based on the Brislin classical translation model[J]. Journal of Nursing Science, 2016, 31(7): 61-63.] DOI: 10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152. 2016.07.061.

11. 张倩,闫春旭,李倩,等. 安宁疗护志愿者动机量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学杂志, 2021, 36(15): 13-16. [Zhang Q, Yan CX, Li Q, et al. Testing of reliability and validity of the Chinese version of inventory of motivations for hospice palliative care volunteerism[J]. Journal of Nursing Science, 2021, 36(15): 13-16.] DOI: 10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2021.15.013.

12. 张晨,周云仙. 我国护理测量工具文献中内容效度指数应用误区分析[J]. 护理学杂志, 2020, 35(4): 86-88, 92. [Zhang C, Zhou YX. Analysis on errors regarding content validity index used in evaluation of measurement tools in Chinese nursing literature[J]. Journal of Nursing Science, 2020, 35(4): 86-88, 92.] DOI: 10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2020.04.086.

13. 郑文智,吴文毅. 结构方程模型拟合评鉴: 整体拟合、内部拟合与复核效度检验[J]. 心理学探新, 2014, 34(1): 57-61. [Zhen WZ, Wu WY. Evaluation of structural equation modeling fitting: the overall fitting, theinternal fitting and cross-validation testing[J]. Psychological Exploration, 2014, 34(1): 57-61.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn. 1003-5184.2014.01.012.

14. 刘燕群. 护理学研究方法[M]. 武汉: 武汉大学出版社, 2023. [Liu YQ. Methods of nursing studies[M]. Wuhan: Wuhan University Press, 2023.]

15. 周咏梅,叶文琴,张玲娟,等. 国内外护士分级现状与我国护士能级结构设置[J]. 解放军护理杂志, 2007, 24(1): 36-38. [Zhou YM, Ye WQ, Zhang LJ, et al. Current situation of nurse grading at home and abroad and construction of nurse capability level in China[J]. Military Nursing, 2007, 24(1): 36-38.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2007.01.016.

16. Kim J, Shin S. Development of the nursing practice readiness scale for new graduate nurses: a methodological study[J]. Nurse Educ Pract, 2022, 59: 103298. DOI: 10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103298.

17. Alquwez N, Cruz JP, Balay-Odao E. Assessing the psychometric properties of the arabic version of the nursing practice readiness scale among Saudi nursing students[J]. PloS One, 2023, 18(7): e0289088. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289088.

18. Jamieson I, Sims D, Basu A, et al. Readiness for practice: the views of New Zealand senior nursing students[J]. Nurse Educ Pract, 2019, 38: 27-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.nepr.2019.05.007.

19. Dudley MT, Khaw D, Botti M, et al. The relationship between the undergraduate clinical learning environment and work readiness in new graduate nurses: a pre-post survey study[J]. Nurse Educ Today, 2020, 94: 104587. DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104587.

20. Güner P. Preparedness of final-year Turkish nursing students for work as a professional nurse[J]. J Clin Nurs, 2015, 24(5-6): 844-854. DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12673.

21. Kirkman T, Hall C, Winston R, et al. Strategies for implementing a multiple patient simulation scenario[J]. Nurse Educ Today, 2018, 64: 11-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt. 2018.01.032.

22. Usher K, Mills J, West C, et al. Preregistration student nurses' self-reported preparedness for practice before and after the introduction of a capstone subject[J]. J Clin Nurs, 2015, 24(21-22): 3245-3254. DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12996.

Popular Papers
© 2022 - 2024 Zhongnan Medical Journal Press of Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University|Support: Yufu Technology
About NM | Contact us