Welcome to visit Zhongnan Medical Journal Press Series journal website!

The effect of marital status on patients with laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma: using data from the SEER database

Published on Dec. 25, 2022Total Views: 3089 timesTotal Downloads: 1159 timesDownloadMobile

Author: Gao-Ya WANG 1 Si-Rong ZHU 2 Min-Lan YANG 1 Xiao-Ping MING 1 Xiu-Ping YANG 1 Xiong CHEN 1

Affiliation: 1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430071, China 2. Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Wuhan Univer-sity, Wuhan 430071, China

Keywords: Laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma Prognostic factors Marital status Survival analysis SEER database

DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1004-5511.202202027

Reference: Wang GY, Zhu SR, Yang ML, Ming XP, Yang XP, Chen X. The effect of marital status on patients with laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma: using data from the SEER database[J]. Yixue Xinzhi Zazhi, 2022, 32(6): 424-433. DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1004-5511.202202027.[Article in Chinese]

  • Abstract
  • Full-text
  • References
Abstract

Objective  To explore the impact of marital status on survival outcomes of patients diagnosed with laryngeal squa-mous cell carcinoma (LSCC). 

Method  Clinical characteristics, basic personal information, and survival follow-up data of patients with LSCC regis-tered from 2004 to 2015 were extracted from the SEER database. Patients were divided according to their marital status into married and unmarried groups. In order to balance the differences between groups, a 1:1 propensity matching analysis (PSM) was performed using the MatchIt package in R software.  5-years overall survival (OS) curves and 5-years cancer-specific survival (CSS) curves were plotted before and after PSM using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the correlation between marital status and the prognosis of LSCC patients was analyzed and tested by the log-rank method. A univariate and multivariate analysis of patient CSS was then performed using the Cox proportional risk model. 

Results A total of 19,042 patients were included in this study. The sample size after PSM matching was 14,400. Kaplan Meier analysis showed that the 5-year OS rate (57% vs. 47%) and median OS survival time (87 months vs. 53 months) and the 5-year CSS rate (69% vs. 62%) of LSCC patients in the married group was higher than that in the un-married group (P < 0.05). Cox proportional risk model showed that unmarried status was significantly correlated with poor prognosis for LSCC patients. Unmarried status may be a risk factors for poor prognosis of CSS in LSCC patients [HR=1.35, 95%CI(1.27, 1.43), P < 0.05]. 

Conclusion  The 5-years CSS and 5-years OS rates of LSCC patients in the married group were significantly higher than those in the unmarried group, marital status was an independent prognostic factor for LCSS patients.

Full-text
Please download the PDF version to read the full text: download
References

1.麦家豪, 马玲国. 人乳头状瘤病毒与喉癌的相关性研究现状[J]. 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2019, 54(5): 385-388. [Mai JH, Ma LG. Human papillomavirus and laryngeal cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, 2019, 54(5): 385-388.] DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2019.05.015.

2.Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, et al. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008[J]. Int J Cancer, 2010, 127(12): 2893-2917. DOI: 10.1002/ijc. 25516.

3.Almadori G, Bussu F, Cadoni G, et al. Molecular markers in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma: towards an integrated clinicobiological approach[J]. Eur J Cancer, 2005, 41(5): 683-693. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2004.10.031.

4.黄海涛, 耿旭, 尚艳秋, 等. 2005—2016年中国喉癌发病及死亡趋势分析[J]. 中国全科医学, 2022, 25(5): 608-614. [Huang HT, Geng X, Shang YQ, et al. Trends of laryngeal cancer incidence and mortality in China, 2005—2016[J]. Chinese General Practice, 2022, 25(5): 608-614.] DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2021.01.047.

5.Ikeda A, Kawachi I, Iso H, et al. Social support and cancer incidence and mortality: the JPHC study cohort II[J]. Cancer Causes Control, 2013, 24(5): 847-860. DOI: 10.1007/s10552-013-0147-7.

6.Chen Z, Yin K, Zheng D, et al. Marital status independently predicts non-small cell lung cancer survival: a propensity-adjusted SEER database analysis[J]. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol, 2020, 146(1): 67-74. DOI: 10.1007/s00432-019-03084-x.

7.Xu C, Liu X, Chen YP, et al. Impact of marital status at diagnosis on survival and its change over time between 1973 and 2012 in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a propensity score-matched anal-ysis[J]. Cancer Med, 2017, 6(12): 3040-3051. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.1232.

8.Cai W, Fan J, Shen T, et al. The influence of marital status on the survival of patients with uveal melano-ma[J]. J Ophthalmol, 2020, 2020: 7012940. DOI: 10.1155/2020/70 12940.

9.Doll KM, Rademaker A, Sosa JA. Practical guide to surgical data sets: surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) database[J]. JAMA Surg, 2018, 153(6): 588-589. DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.0501.

10.Zhang Q, Wang H, Zhao Q, et al. Evaluation of risk factors for laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma: a sin-gle-center retrospective study[J]. Front Oncol, 2021, 11: 606010. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.606010.

11.Allegra E, Bianco MR, Ralli M, et al. Role of clinical-demographic data in survival rates of advanced lar-yngeal cancer[J]. Medicina (Kaunas), 2021, 57(3): 267. DOI: 10.3390/medicina57030267.

12.刘航睿, 孟祥瑞, 辛道, 等. 婚姻状况对已发生远处转移食管癌患者的生存影响分析[J]. 食管疾病, 2019, 1(4): 52-55. [Liu HR, Meng XR, Xin D, et al. Influence of marital status on survival of esophageal cancer patients with distant metastasis[J]. Journal of Esophageal Diseases, 2019, 1(4): 52-55.] DOI: CNKI:SUN:LYYZ.0.2019-04-012.

13.Wang P, Wang Z, Yan Y, et al. Psychological stress up-regulates CD147 expression through Be-ta-Arrestin1/ERK to promote proliferation and invasiveness of glioma cells[J]. Front Oncol, 2020,10: 571181. DOI: 10.3389/fonc. 2020.571181.

14.Ben-Shlomo Y, Smith GD, Shipley M, et al. Magnitude and causes of mortality differences between mar-ried and unmarried men[J]. J Epidemiol Community Health, 1993, 47(3): 200-205. DOI: 10.1136/jech.47.3.200.

15.Inverso G, Mahal BA, Aizer AA, et al. Marital status and head and neck cancer outcomes[J]. Cancer, 2015, 121(8): 1273-1278. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29171.

16.Lagergren J, Andersson G, Talback M, et al. Marital status, education, and income in relation to the risk of esophageal and gastric cancer by histological type and site[J]. Cancer, 2016, 122(2): 207-212. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29731.

17.Irani E, Park S, Hickman RL. Negative marital interaction, purpose in life, and depressive symptoms among middle-aged and older couples: evidence from the health and retirement study[J]. Aging Ment Health, 2022, 26(4): 860-869. DOI: 10.1080/13607863.2021.1904831.

18.Lee C, Shin E. Effects of health insurance on non-working married women's medical care use and bed days at home[J]. BMC Health Serv Res, 2013, 13: 243. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-243.

19.Ding Z, Yu D, Li H, et al. Effects of marital status on overall and cancer-specific survival in laryngeal can-cer patients: a population-based study[J]. Sci Rep, 2021, 11(1): 723. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-80698-z.

20.Ogden MW, Morgan WT, Heavner DL, et al. National incidence of smoking and misclassification among the U.S. married female population[J]. J Clin Epidemiol, 1997, 50(3): 253-263. DOI: 10.1016/S0895-4356(96)00378-2.