Welcome to visit Zhongnan Medical Journal Press Series journal website!

The effect of three-dimensional finite element technology combined with problem-based learning teaching model in clinical teaching of orthopaedic graduate students

Published on Oct. 25, 2021Total Views: 3543 timesTotal Downloads: 2260 timesDownloadMobile

Author: Li-Jun SHI 1, 2 Fu-Qiang GAO 2, 3, 4 Wei SUN 2, 3, 4 Pei-Xu WANG 2, 3 Zhi-Zhuo LI 3, 4

Affiliation: 1. Department of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450000, China 2. Graduate School of Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China 3. Department of Orthopedics, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China 4. Peking University China-Japan Friendship Clinical School, Beijing 100029, China

Keywords: Three-dimensional finite element technology PBL Teaching Graduate students

DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1004-5511.202103026

Reference: Shi LJ, Gao FQ, Sun W, Wang PX, Li ZZ. The effect of three-dimensional finite element technology combined with problem-based learning teaching model in clinical teaching of orthopaedic graduate students[J]. Yixue Xinzhi Zazhi, 2021, 31(5): 400-404. DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1004-5511.202103026.[Article in Chinese]

  • Abstract
  • Full-text
  • References
Abstract

Objective  To evaluate the effect of three-dimensional finite element technology combined with the Problem-Based Learning (PBL) teaching model in the teaching of clinical practice to orthopedic graduate students. Methods  42 postgraduates who had undergone standardized residency training at the Orthopedic Base of the Chi-na-Japan Friendship Hospital from September 2019 to December 2020 were randomly divided into A, B, and C groups. The 42 postgraduates were taught by different methods for the same course content. Group A received 3D fi-nite element technology combined with PBL, Group B received PBL, and Group C received traditional teaching. The effects of the teaching were evaluated through examinations and self-evaluation questionnaires. Results  Examina-tion grades among students in group A were significantly higher than those in groups B (78.57% vs. 35.71%) and C (78.57% vs. 21.43%). Scores for degree of satisfaction with teaching, knowledge mastery and course interest in group A were also significantly higher than those in groups B and C, and the difference was statistically significant (P< 0.05). Conclusion  Three-dimensional finite element technology combined with a PBL teaching model can significantly improve students' academic performance, improve teaching quality, and provides a better teaching experience.

Full-text
Please download the PDF version to read the full text: download
References

1.李涛, 史占军, 吴宣平, 等. PBL教学模式在骨科教学中的实践[J]. 分子影像学杂志, 2018, 41(2): 278-280. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-4500.2018.02.34.[Li T, Shi ZJ, Wu XP, et al. Application of PBL model in orthopedics teaching[J]. Journal of Molecular Imaging, 2018, 41(2): 278-280.]

2.Sriraman V, Torres A, Ortiz AM. Teaching sustainable engineering and industrial ecology using a hy-brid problem-project based learning approach[J]. J Eng Technol, 2017, 34(2): 8-15.

3.Wang D, Samaka M, Miao Y, et al. A model-driven PBL application to support the authoring, delivery, and execution of PBL processes[J]. Res Pract Technol Enhanc Learn, 2016, 11(1): 6. DOI: 10.1186/s41039-016-0030-8.

4.James H, Al Khaja KA, Sequeira RP. Effective use of real-life events as tools for teaching-learning clini-cal pharmacology in a problem-based learning curriculum[J]. Indian J Pharmacol, 2015, 47(3): 316-321. DOI: 10.4103/ 0253-7613.157131.

5.周建华, 王跃. 有限元分析在骨科中的应用及研究进展[J]. 实用医院临床杂志, 2018, 15(1): 205-208. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-7083.2020.06.006. [Zhou JH, Wang Y. The application and research prognosis of fi-nite element analysis in orthopaedics[J]. Practical Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2018, 15(1): 205-208.]

6.Brekelmans WA, Poort HW, Slooff TJ. A new method to analyse the mechanical behaviour of skeletal parts[J]. Acta Orthop Scand, 1972, 43(5): 301-317. DOI: 10.3109/ 17453677208998949. 

7.Rybicki EF, Simonen FA, Weis EB Jr. On the mathematical analysis of stress in the human femur[J]. J Biomech, 1972, 5(2): 203-215. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(72)90056-5. 

8.Bae JY, Kwak DS, Park KS, et al. Finite element analysis of the multiple drilling technique for early os-teonecrosis of the femoral head[J]. Ann Biomed Eng, 2013, 41(12): 2528-2537. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-013-0851-1. 

9.Yu T, Xie L, Chu F. A sclerotic rim provides mechanical support for the femoral head in osteonecrosis[J]. Orthopedics, 2015, 38(5): e374-9. DOI: 10.3928/01477 447-20150504-53. 

10.Zumbrunn T, Patel R, Duffy MP, et al. Cadaver-specific models for finite-element analysis of iliopsoas impingement in dual-mobility hip implants[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2018, 33(11): 3574-3580. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.06.029.

11.郑翔, 顾乡. 有限元分析课程引入问题式学习(PBL)教学探索[J]. 力学与实践, 2011, 33(6): 88-91. DOI: 10.6052/1000-0992-lxysj2010-486. [Zheng X, Gu X. The finite element analysis course introduces prob-lem-based learning (PBL) teaching exploration[J]. Mechanics and Engineering, 2011, 33(6): 88-91.]

12.贾博, 刘伟, 郭庆东. 初步探讨PBL教学在临床教学中的应用和优化[J]. 中华神经外科疾病研究杂志, 2018, 17(3): 262-264. DOI: CNKI:SUN:SJWK.0.2018-03-019. [Jia B, Liu W, Guo QD. The application and optimization of PBL teaching model in clinical teaching: a preliminary discussion[J]. Chinese Journal of Neurosurgical Disease Research, 2018, 17(3): 262-264.]

13.Stentoft D. Problem-based projects in medical education: extending PBL practices and broadening learning perspectives[J]. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract, 2019, 24(5): 959-969. DOI: 10.1007/s10459-019-09917-1.

14.Al-Azri H, Ratnapalan S. Problem-based learning in continuing medical education: review of random-ized controlled trials[J]. Can Fam Physician, 2014, 60(2): 157-165. DOI: 10.1097/01.GME.0000109745.62578.9B.

15.Jin J, Bridges SM. Educational technologies in problem-based learning in health sciences education: a systematic review[J]. J Med Internet Res, 2014, 16(12): e251. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.3240.

16.Noordegraaf-Eelens L, Kloeg J, Noordzij G. PBL and sustainable education: addressing the problem of isolation[J]. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract, 2019, 24(5): 971-979. DOI: 10.1007/s10459-019-09927-z.

17.Fan C, Jiang B, Shi X, et al. Update on research and application of problem-based learning in medical science education[J]. Biochem Mol Biol Educ, 2018, 46(2): 186-194. DOI: 10.1002/bmb.21105.

18.Chandran V, Maquer G, Gerig T, et al. Supervised learning for bone shape and cortical thickness esti-mation from CT images for finite element analysis[J]. Med Image Anal, 2019, 52: 42-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2018.11.001. 

19.Yang L, Parimi N, Orwoll ES, et al. Association of incident hip fracture with the estimated femoral strength by finite element analysis of DXA scans in the osteoporotic fractures in men (MrOS) study[J]. Osteoporos Int, 2018, 29(3): 643-651. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-017-4319-2.

20.Ford S, Minshall T. 3D printing in teaching and education: a review of where and how it is used[J]. Ad-ditive Manufacturing, 2017.